crashes with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "crashes with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where two or more things collide or conflict, often in a technical or metaphorical context. Example: "The software crashes with the new update, causing significant issues for users."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Each year since 1995, more people in passenger cars have been killed in crashes with light trucks than in crashes with other passenger cars, the safety agency said.

The New York Times

Liquidity and Market Crashes, with J. Huang, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming, 2008.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

But a number of collisions have led to crashes, with some deaths.

The New York Times

For near misses or crashes with only minor injuries, workers are expected back the next day.

The New York Times

Did I mention that the house has a helipad, for staging spectacular crashes with dead moguls?

The New York Times - Books

A yet larger category is crashes with property damage but no injury.

The New York Times

Use of mobile phones while driving is known to cause crashes with possible fatalities.

Accident Analysis & Prevention

Approach angle is the most significant determinant of crashes, with a critical traversing angle of 30°.

Journal of Transport & Health

Estimated program effects were largest on fatal crashes, with an estimated reduction of 31%.

Accident Analysis & Prevention

A 2001 study by the IIHS found that roundabouts have 80% fewer crashes with injuries than ordinary intersections.

The Economist

For the third year in a row, the city said, no pedestrians were killed in crashes with cyclists.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing events, use "crashes with" to emphasize a physical collision or a conflict involving different entities. This framing can highlight the interaction and its consequences more directly.

Common error

Avoid using "crashes with" in contexts where a more nuanced term like "conflicts with" or "contradicts" would be more appropriate. Overusing it can make your writing sound repetitive or inappropriately forceful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "crashes with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, indicating a collision, impact, or conflict between two or more entities. It connects a subject with an object that it interacts with, as shown in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "crashes with" is a grammatically correct and versatile prepositional phrase used to describe collisions, conflicts, or impactful interactions. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across diverse contexts, from physical accidents to abstract disagreements. While "collides with" and "conflicts with" serve as alternatives, the choice depends on the desired emphasis. The phrase is most frequently found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, reflecting its neutral register and widespread applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

colliding with

This is a more literal and direct synonym.

collisions involving

Focuses on the act of colliding and subsequent involvement.

accidents involving

Highlights the accidental nature of the crash and its connection to something else.

impacts upon

Emphasizes the force and consequence of the collision.

collisions connected to

Highlights a link between the event of crashing and a specific object or element.

incidents associated with

Broadens the scope to include any incident related to crashes.

clashes against

Suggests a more violent or forceful impact.

smashing into

Describes the event as a high velocity breaking action.

encounters involving

Suggests an unplanned or unexpected meeting leading to a collision.

confrontations featuring

Implies a conflict leading to a physical crash or collision.

FAQs

How can I use "crashes with" in a sentence?

You can use "crashes with" to describe a collision between objects, like "The car "crashes with" the tree", or a conflict between ideas, such as "His opinion "crashes with" mine".

What are some alternatives to "crashes with"?

Alternatives include "collides with", "impacts upon", or "involves", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "crashes with" or "crashes into"?

"Crashes with" implies an interaction or involvement, while "crashes into" suggests a direct collision. Use "crashes into" when describing a physical impact and "crashes with" when indicating involvement or interaction after the impact.

Is there a difference between "crashes with" and "conflicts with"?

"Crashes with" often suggests a more forceful or abrupt interaction, while "conflicts with" implies a disagreement or incompatibility that may not necessarily involve a physical impact. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize a physical or abstract conflict.