crashed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"crashed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a collision between two objects, such as cars. For example, "Two cars crashed with each other at the intersection."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Her confidence crashed with her.

The New York Times - Sports

Then oil prices crashed with the global recession.

The Economist

My heart lifted and crashed with the impact.

The New York Times - Magazine

Back in gray, damp Dublin, I crashed with friends and read and wrote.

University of Pennsylvania

He lived there, and crashed with friends, for a long stretch.

The New York Times

"The southern bluefin has already essentially crashed, with little hope of recovery".

The New York Times

That was when her Rover crashed, with Princess Grace and her daughter Stéphanie inside.

The New Yorker

Aguigui impetuously packed up his belongings and crashed with his friend Matthew Asimakoupoulos.

The New Yorker

The Airbus A320 crashed with 66 people on board, including 30 Egyptians and 15 from France.

The Guardian

Bigger ones required more work, but creaked and crashed with satisfying volume.

The New York Times

And when he crashed with about a half-mile to go, it did not stop him.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "crashed with" to describe a physical collision or a sudden, impactful failure. Ensure the context clearly indicates what is colliding or failing alongside something else.

Common error

While similar, "crashed with" often implies a more severe or destructive impact than "collided with". Use "crashed with" when emphasizing the force and damage of the impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "crashed with" primarily functions as a verb phrase acting as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun. It describes an action where something collides forcefully or fails simultaneously alongside something else. Ludwig confirms this usage in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "crashed with" is a commonly used phrase, often describing a forceful collision or simultaneous failure. Grammatically sound, it appears most frequently in news and media contexts. Ludwig AI validates its usage and appropriateness. When using "crashed with", consider the severity of the impact and whether a more formal alternative like "collided with" or "failed alongside" would be more suitable. The phrase serves to highlight the abrupt and impactful nature of an event, whether literal or metaphorical.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collided with

Implies a direct impact or clash between two entities, similar to a crash.

smashed into

Suggests a forceful impact, emphasizing the breaking or shattering aspect.

impacted with

More formal and technical term for a collision, often used in scientific or engineering contexts.

collapsed with

Emphasizes the idea of something giving way or falling apart suddenly.

was wrecked with

Suggests severe damage and destruction, similar to the aftermath of a crash.

failed alongside

Indicates a simultaneous failure or collapse, often in a metaphorical sense.

was shattered with

Implies a breaking or shattering of something, metaphorically or literally.

declined with

Suggests a simultaneous decrease or deterioration in value or condition.

was destroyed with

Emphasizes complete ruin or devastation resulting from a shared event or cause.

deteriorated alongside

Implies a gradual worsening or decay occurring at the same time.

FAQs

How can I use "crashed with" in a sentence?

You can use "crashed with" to describe physical collisions, such as "The plane "crashed with" another aircraft", or metaphorical failures, like "His career "crashed with" the dot-com bubble burst".

What are some alternatives to "crashed with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "collided with", "smashed into", or "failed alongside".

Is it always appropriate to use "crashed with" to describe a business failure?

While acceptable, using "failed alongside" or "collapsed with" might be more appropriate in formal business contexts, as "crashed with" can sound overly dramatic.

Which is more impactful, "crashed with" or "collided with"?

"Crashed with" typically implies a more significant and destructive impact than "collided with". Consider the severity of the event when choosing between the two.