covered of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "covered of" is not grammatically correct and not commonly used in written English.
The correct phrase is "covered with" or "covered in." For example: "The table was covered with a red tablecloth" or "The ground was covered in snow."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

I count it again, as a tangible marker of psychic distance covered, of time passed.

The Guardian - Opinion

The saturation (% area covered) of these preferred habitats with H. mantegazzianum was 8.7%.

Journal for Nature Conservation

And the controversy over Mr. Obama's relationship with Mr. Wright was one of the most covered of the 2008 primary.

The New York Times

Topics covered of interest to biochemistry include aromatic compounds, amines and heterocycles, amino acids, proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids and polymers.

Stanford University

Given the fact that Christie was bashing Trump on the stump just a few weeks ago, his endorsement was the most dramatic (and heavily covered) of the two.

The New Yorker

Louis Theroux's My Scientology Movie pulls off the neat trick of finding a revelatory approach to a topic that's been well covered of late: the Church of Scientology.

The Guardian - Film

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

Cover of her book.

Huffington Post

Cover of "Naked Hollywood".

Huffington Post

Live video covers out-of-market games.

The New York Times - Tech

Medicare covered most of it.

The New York Times

True, that still covered 8.2% of spending.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "covered with" or "covered in" instead of "covered of" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity. This simple substitution avoids a common error and enhances the professionalism of your writing.

Common error

Don't assume "covered of" is acceptable due to its occasional appearance online. While it might show up in various contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Rely on the standard alternatives "covered with" or "covered in" to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "covered of", though present in some contexts, functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase intended to describe something being overlaid or concealed. However, as indicated by Ludwig, this construction violates standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "covered of" appears in various online sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As confirmed by Ludwig, standard English dictates the use of "covered with" or "covered in" to accurately convey that something is overlaid or concealed. Although Ludwig's examples show that "covered of" does appear across different categories like Science, News & Media, and Wiki, it's best to avoid it in formal writing. Use "covered with" or "covered in" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, enhancing the credibility of your communication. Always prioritize standard English conventions to maintain professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

covered with

Replaces "of" with "with" to indicate the material covering something, resulting in correct grammar.

covered in

Substitutes "of" with "in" to denote the substance or material providing coverage, aligning with standard English usage.

blanketed by

Employs "blanketed by" to suggest a complete or extensive covering, shifting the imagery slightly.

overlaid with

Uses "overlaid with" to describe something being placed on top as a covering, adding a layer of specificity.

coated with

Implies a thin layer of covering, suitable when the covering is a coating.

wrapped in

Conveys being enclosed or surrounded by something, altering the sense of coverage.

hidden under

Changes the focus to concealment rather than just covering, adding nuance to the meaning.

draped in

Suggests a loose, elegant covering, modifying the tone and imagery.

masked by

Indicates that something is covered to obscure or conceal it, altering the emphasis.

shielded by

Implies protection or defense through covering, changing the purpose of the action.

FAQs

How should I correctly use the phrase "covered of" in a sentence?

The phrase "covered of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "covered with", as in "The ground was "covered with" snow", or "covered in", such as "The cake was "covered in" frosting".

What's the difference between "covered with" and "covered of"?

"Covered with" is the grammatically correct way to express that something is overlaid or concealed by something else. "Covered of" is not standard English and should be avoided. For example, use "The book was "covered with" dust" instead of "covered of dust".

Are there situations where "covered of" might be acceptable?

No, "covered of" is not considered acceptable in standard English writing or speech. Always opt for "covered with" or "covered in" to ensure grammatical correctness. Both of these alternatives convey the intended meaning effectively.

What are some alternatives to "covered with" besides "covered in"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "blanketed by", "overlaid with", or "hidden under depending" on whether you want to emphasize complete coverage, layering, or concealment.