covered with

USAGE SUMMARY

"covered with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to something being completely covered in a certain substance, such as "The floor was covered with dust."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It's covered with blue cards.

The New York Times

She is covered with wires.

The New Yorker

He was covered with fire".

The New York Times - Sports

They were covered with flies.

The New York Times

They were covered with bloodstains.

The New Yorker

I was covered with sweat.

The New Yorker

They found it covered with graffiti.

The New York Times

However, declarer covered with his king.

The New York Times

Waterlogged cars were covered with muck.

The New York Times - Sports

But he covered with his king.

The New York Times

The Earth is covered with tectonic plates.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "covered with" to describe something that is fully concealed or has a layer of something else on its surface. Be specific about what the subject is covered with for clarity.

Common error

Avoid substituting "with" with other prepositions like "by" or "in" after "covered". Using "covered by" or "covered in" changes the meaning slightly or might be grammatically incorrect in certain contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "covered with" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that it is enveloped or layered by something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples include "The Earth is covered with tectonic plates" and "His face was covered with bright tattoos".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Wiki

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Science

16%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "covered with" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to describe something enveloped or layered by another substance. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread usage. It appears most frequently in News & Media, encyclopedias and Wiki sources, maintaining a neutral register applicable across different contexts. The phrase functions descriptively, providing a clear visualization of the subject's state. While alternatives like "coated in" or "smothered in" exist, "covered with" remains a reliable and common choice for expressing this concept. When using "covered with", remember to be specific about what the subject is covered with for maximum clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

coated in

Implies a layer of a substance adhered to the surface, often a thinner layer than "covered with".

blanketed by

Suggests a uniform and extensive covering, like a blanket.

smothered in

Suggests a thick, heavy covering, often used for food or something unpleasant.

carpeted with

Suggests a dense covering, similar to how a carpet covers a floor.

drenched in

Implies being thoroughly soaked or saturated with a liquid.

cloaked in

Implies a concealing or enveloping layer, often used metaphorically.

laden with

Suggests being heavily burdened or filled to capacity with something.

topped with

Indicates a layer or addition to the upper part of something.

filled with

Indicates the interior of something is full.

awash in

Implies being surrounded or overflowing with something, often figuratively.

FAQs

How can I use "covered with" in a sentence?

The phrase "covered with" is used to describe something that has a layer of something else on its surface. For example, "The ground was covered with snow", or "Her face was covered with freckles".

What can I say instead of "covered with"?

You can use alternatives like "coated in", "smothered in", or "blanketed by", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "covered in" instead of "covered with"?

While "covered with" is generally preferred in formal writing, "covered in" is also commonly used and widely accepted, especially in informal contexts. The choice depends on the desired tone and audience.

What is the difference between "covered with" and "filled with"?

"Covered with" implies an external layer or coating, while "filled with" indicates that the interior of something is full. For example, "The table was covered with books" versus "The room was filled with people".