covered in snow

USAGE SUMMARY

'covered in snow' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to describe something that is completely covered in snow. For example, "We woke up to find the entire landscape covered in snow".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The body was soon covered in snow.

The New York Times - Sports

The whole town was covered in snow.

The Guardian - Sport

I remember waking up covered in snow.

The Guardian - Arts

The world outside was covered in snow.

The New York Times - Travel

He sometimes woke with his bed covered in snow.

The Economist

The mountains, newly covered in snow, sparkled beyond the rooftops.

The New Yorker

In the cold winter, those roads are covered in snow.

The New York Times

It's just possible it could be covered in snow.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The trees should be covered in snow by this time.

The New York Times

John appeared a few minutes later, covered in snow.

The New York Times - Sports

"I like the one that is covered in snow".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "covered in snow" to vividly describe landscapes, objects, or people after a snowfall. It emphasizes the thoroughness of the snow's coverage.

Common error

Avoid using "covered in snow" repetitively in a single piece of writing. Vary your descriptions by using synonyms like "blanketed with snow" or focusing on specific visual details such as the texture and depth of the snow.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "covered in snow" functions primarily as an adjectival phrase. It modifies a noun, providing a description of its state or appearance. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

19%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "covered in snow" is a grammatically sound and widely used adjectival phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It serves to vividly describe scenes or objects enveloped by snow, painting a picture of winter conditions. Predominantly found in news and media, as well as academic contexts, its register is generally neutral, making it suitable for various forms of communication. Remember to use it to emphasize complete coverage and vary your descriptions by considering alternatives like "blanketed with snow" to avoid repetition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Snow-covered

A more concise adjective form indicating coverage by snow.

Blanketed with snow

Emphasizes the covering aspect of snow, like a blanket.

Under a blanket of snow

Highlights the sheltering or concealing effect of the snow.

Enveloped in snow

Focuses on the idea of being surrounded or enclosed by snow.

Mantled in snow

Uses a more formal term, "mantled", to convey being covered.

Smothered in snow

Implies a thick, heavy layer of snow that stifles or conceals.

Swathed in snow

Implies being wrapped or enfolded in snow.

Caped in snow

Evokes the image of a cape, suggesting a covering on the upper part.

Dusted with snow

Suggests a light, fine layer of snow rather than full coverage.

Laden with snow

Highlights the weight and burden of the snow.

FAQs

How can I use "covered in snow" in a sentence?

You can use "covered in snow" to describe something that is completely enveloped by snow, such as "The mountains were "covered in snow"" or "The car was entirely "covered in snow" after the blizzard".

What are some alternatives to "covered in snow"?

Alternatives include "blanketed with snow", "snow-covered", or "under a blanket of snow". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "covered by snow" instead of "covered in snow"?

Both "covered in snow" and "covered by snow" are grammatically correct, but "covered in snow" is generally more common and idiomatic. The difference is subtle; "by" emphasizes the agent causing the covering, while "in" emphasizes the substance itself.

Which is more descriptive, "covered in snow" or "dusted with snow"?

"Covered in snow" implies a substantial layer of snow, completely obscuring the object beneath. "Dusted with snow" suggests a light, fine layer. Therefore, ""covered in snow"" is more descriptive when the object is significantly enveloped, while "dusted with snow" is more appropriate for a light snowfall.