cover with mud

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cover with mud" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is being physically or metaphorically obscured or soiled by mud. Example: "After the rain, the children loved to cover themselves with mud while playing in the puddles."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Cover with mud, one or two coats.

WikiHow

Can cover with mud or not or use spackle.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

She was filthy - covered with mud.

The New Yorker

Its bottom is covered with mud, sand, rock, and shells.

Britannica

Rescuers she spoke to were "all soaked and were covered with mud," Ms. Hersman said.

The New York Times

Mr. Rocha could not read his wristwatch — it too was covered with mud.

The New York Times

All of the tablets were, to some degree, still covered with mud.

The Washington Post

Below, a 48-megawatt power plant knocked out of commission was still largely covered with mud.

The New York Times

Glass was covered with mud by the time he reached West.

The New York Times - Sports

Today it was covered with mud, making it treacherous to cross.

The New York Times - Sports

I was embarrassed and bleeding, covered with mud, and security was threatening to throw me out.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "cover with mud" to describe the action of applying mud to a surface, whether literally or figuratively. Consider the texture and consistency implied by "mud" in your context.

Common error

While grammatically sound, "cover with mud" can sound informal or even comical in some formal contexts. Consider using alternatives like "coat with sediment" or "plaster with earth" when a more serious tone is needed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cover with mud" functions primarily as a verb phrase, describing the action of applying mud to a surface. Ludwig AI indicates it's a usable phrase. The provided examples in Ludwig demonstrate its application in describing the process of coating something in mud.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Wiki

30%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cover with mud" is a grammatically correct verb phrase that describes the action of applying mud to a surface. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is appropriate for use in written English. While not a very common phrase, it is most frequently found in news and media and wiki contexts. Its register is generally neutral to informal. When writing, be mindful of the tone to avoid being perceived as comical in formal contexts. Consider semantically similar alternatives such as "smear with mud" or "coat with mud" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

smear with mud

Focuses on the act of spreading mud.

smeared in mud

Similar to smear with mud, emphasizing the spreading action.

plaster with mud

Implies a thicker, more complete application of mud.

coat with mud

A more general term for applying a layer of mud.

daub with mud

Suggests a rough or irregular application of mud.

caked in mud

Indicates a thick, hardened layer of mud.

mud-covered

Adjectival form emphasizing the state of being covered.

mud-splattered

Focuses on mud being splashed onto something.

envelop in mud

Implies a complete and surrounding coverage of mud.

bedeck with mud

Suggests covering something with mud for decorative effect.

FAQs

How can I use "cover with mud" in a sentence?

You can use "cover with mud" to describe a surface that has been coated in mud. For example, "The children loved to "cover with mud" after playing in the rain."

What can I say instead of "cover with mud"?

You can use alternatives like "smear with mud", "coat with mud", or "plaster with mud" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "covered in mud" instead of "cover with mud"?

"Covered in mud" is an adjective phrase describing something that has mud on its surface, while "cover with mud" is a verb phrase describing the action of applying mud. Both are correct but used in different grammatical constructions.

What is the difference between "cover with mud" and "mud-covered"?

"Cover with mud" is a verb phrase that describes the action of applying mud to something, while "mud-covered" is an adjective describing something that has already been covered in mud.