could workers

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could workers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential actions or abilities of workers in various contexts, such as employment, productivity, or capabilities. Example: "In the right conditions, could workers increase their efficiency significantly?"

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Only through collective effort could workers enforce the list of "prices" they established for their work and defend their trades against cheap and diluted labour.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Instead of closing Italian factories, which have been producing fewer than half as many cars as they could, workers there will focus on producing Alfa Romeos, Jeeps and Maseratis, Mr. Marchionne said.

The New York Times

How could workers not be impressed by leaders' willingness to take such steps on their behalf?

Huffington Post

Rejecting the devout Catholicism of his childhood, Czolgosz found a new religion in anarchism, which asserted that only through violent action could workers break the capitalists stranglehold on power.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

This could encourage workers to pass up potential job opportunities.

The Economist

Businesses could train workers on the job, achieving competitive productivity.

The New York Times

But worries about jobs could lead workers to save the money instead.

The Economist

Josh Gold, political director at the hotel union, warned that the requirements could "intimidate" workers.

The New York Times

Employers in Utah could request workers and the Mexican authorities would screen applicants.

The Economist

For instance, it could give workers displaced by trade wage insurance or early retirement.

The New York Times - Magazine

It previously suggested employers could force workers aged 65 to retire subject to giving them notice.

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could workers", ensure the context clearly indicates what potential actions or abilities are being discussed. Clarity is key to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "could workers" in overly broad statements without specifying the conditions or actions. For example, instead of saying "Training could workers", specify what type of training and the expected outcome for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could workers" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating possibility or potential ability related to workers. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's usable to express hypothetical scenarios where workers might perform specific actions or achieve certain outcomes.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Encyclopedias

30%

Science

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "could workers" is a grammatically correct and neutrally registered phrase used to explore the potential abilities or hypothetical actions of workers. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a valid construct for discussing possibilities related to workers in various contexts, most commonly in news, encyclopedias, and scientific articles. While not exceptionally frequent, its usage is clear and consistent, making it a useful tool for discussing the potential impact of different scenarios on the workforce. Remember to specify the conditions or actions being discussed to avoid overgeneralization.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

workers might

Replaces "could" with "might", indicating a possibility rather than a capability.

employees could

Substitutes "workers" with "employees", offering a more formal term.

staff could

Replaces "workers" with "staff", suitable for a broader range of work environments.

laborers could

Uses "laborers" instead of "workers", emphasizing physical or manual work.

personnel could

Replaces "workers" with "personnel", a more formal and organizational term.

workforce could

Uses "workforce" as a collective noun instead of individual "workers".

are workers able to

Rephrases the sentence to focus on the ability of workers.

workers have the potential to

Emphasizes the potential of workers rather than their current capability.

workers are capable of

Highlights the inherent capability of workers.

workers are in a position to

Focuses on the circumstances that allow workers to do something.

FAQs

How can I use "could workers" in a sentence?

Use "could workers" to discuss potential actions or abilities of employees. For example, "With better tools, "could workers" increase their productivity?"

What are some alternatives to "could workers"?

Alternatives include "workers might", "employees could", or "are workers able to", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is "could workers" grammatically correct?

Yes, "could workers" is grammatically correct when used to express the potential or ability of workers to perform certain actions.

What is the difference between "could workers" and "can workers"?

"Could workers" suggests a possibility or potential, while "can workers" indicates a current ability or permission. "Could" is often used for hypothetical situations, whereas "can" implies something is presently feasible. For example: Could workers (in ideal conditions) reach a higher production rate?. Can workers operate this machine (are they permitted and able)?.