could win

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could win" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a possibility or potential outcome in various contexts, often related to competitions or contests. Example: "With their current performance, the team could win the championship this year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Only one could win.

The New York Times - Books

actually could win.

The New Yorker

Mr. Romney could win.

The New York Times

"Anybody could win it.

The New York Times

I could win a sprint".

The New York Times - Sports

Federer could win again today.

The New York Times

Or the Jets could win.

The New York Times - Sports

They knew we could win.

The New York Times - Sports

He could win both races.

The New Yorker

The Flyers could win.

The New Yorker

Any town could win".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could win", consider the context to ensure it accurately reflects the degree of possibility or potential. Avoid overusing it in situations where a stronger expression of certainty or uncertainty is more appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "could win" when the outcome is already known or highly probable. For example, instead of saying "The team could win since they're leading by 20 points with one minute left", use "The team is likely to win."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could win" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing possibility or potential. It indicates that a particular outcome is possible, but not guaranteed. Ludwig AI shows examples where "could win" is used in various contexts, from sports to politics, to suggest potential victory.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Sports

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "could win" is a versatile modal verb phrase used to express possibility or potential in a variety of contexts. Ludwig AI indicates it's grammatically correct and frequently used. The phrase appears most often in News & Media and Sports contexts, suggesting its widespread applicability in discussions about potential outcomes. Alternatives like "might triumph" or "has the potential to succeed" can be used to convey similar meanings with slight variations in nuance. When using "could win", remember that it implies possibility, not certainty, and avoid misusing it when the outcome is already determined.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

might triumph

Replaces "could" with "might" and "win" with "triumph", suggesting a possibility of victory.

may be victorious

Substitutes "could" with "may be" and "win" with "victorious", indicating a chance of achieving victory.

stands a chance of winning

Emphasizes the possibility of winning, highlighting the element of chance.

has the potential to succeed

Replaces the entire phrase with a more descriptive expression of potential success.

is in with a shot

A more informal phrase suggesting a reasonable possibility of winning.

is capable of winning

Focuses on the ability or capacity to win, rather than the probability.

is likely to be victorious

Indicates a higher probability of winning compared to "could win".

is able to secure victory

Highlights the capability to achieve a win, using more formal language.

is favored to win

Suggests that the subject is expected to win, implying a stronger likelihood.

is tipped to win

Indicates that the subject has been predicted to win by an expert or authority.

FAQs

How can I use "could win" in a sentence?

Use "could win" to express a possibility or potential outcome. For example, "The underdog team "could win" if they play their best game."

What are some alternatives to "could win"?

Alternatives include "might triumph", "may be victorious", or "has the potential to succeed", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "could to win" instead of "could win"?

No, "could to win" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""could win"", where "could" is a modal verb followed by the base form of the verb "win".

What's the difference between "could win" and "will win"?

"Could win" indicates a possibility, while "will win" suggests a higher degree of certainty about the outcome.