Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could we overtake
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "could we overtake" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when asking if it is possible to surpass or pass someone or something, often in a competitive context, such as racing or discussions. Example: "If we maintain our current speed, could we overtake the car in front of us before the next turn?"
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Sports
Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Yes! Could we overtake it?
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
"I did think they were spectacularly sore losers, but I could not care less if we overtake the Times.
News & Media
"Unfortunately we could not overtake because when four cars in a group the last three cars all open the DRS (overtaking aid) so I could not overtake anyone.
News & Media
But they could not overtake the Giants.
News & Media
But I still couldn't overtake".
News & Media
But they could not overtake Indiana.
News & Media
Among them was Davis, who did what he could to overtake Johnson.
News & Media
Serbia pressed in the second half but could not overtake the world's ninth-ranked team.
News & Media
Beijing could soon overtake Atlanta as the world's busiest airport in passenger traffic.
News & Media
I couldn't overtake Victoria Pendleton, could I? Could I? It didn't take long to decide.
News & Media
Bed, Bath & Beyond could soon overtake Brooks Brothers as the haberdasher of the workforce.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "could we overtake" when you want to inquire about the possibility of surpassing something or someone, especially in a competitive or comparative context. Ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being overtaken.
Common error
Avoid using "could we overtake" in situations where the concept of 'overtaking' does not logically apply. Ensure that the context involves a quantifiable or measurable element that can be surpassed. For example, it's inappropriate to ask "Could we overtake happiness?" because happiness is not measured in a way that one can surpass it.
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could we overtake" functions as an interrogative phrase used to inquire about the possibility of surpassing or exceeding something or someone. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
30%
Science
10%
Less common in
Reference
5%
Wiki
5%
Academia
10%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "could we overtake" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed interrogative construction used to inquire about the potential to surpass something or someone. As supported by Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for diverse contexts spanning news and media, formal business discussions, and scientific analyses. The phrase's neutral register allows for flexibility in communication, and while alternative phrasing exists to convey similar ideas, "could we overtake" remains a direct and clear way to explore possibilities of advancement or superiority.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
can we pass
Uses "can" instead of "could", indicating a higher probability or certainty of overtaking.
are we able to surpass
Replaces "overtake" with "surpass" and uses "are we able to", adding a sense of capability.
is it possible to exceed
Employs "exceed" instead of "overtake", focusing on exceeding a certain limit or expectation.
can we get ahead of
Uses the phrasal verb "get ahead of" instead of "overtake", implying a competitive advancement.
might we outstrip
Replaces "overtake" with "outstrip", suggesting a significant surpassing or outdoing.
could we outdo
Substitutes "overtake" with "outdo", implying exceeding someone's performance or actions.
are we in a position to overtake
Adds "are we in a position to", focusing on the current circumstances allowing for overtaking.
is there a chance to pass
Uses "is there a chance to" to express the possibility of overtaking.
do we have the opportunity to surpass
Focuses on the opportunity to surpass, replacing "overtake" with "surpass".
would it be feasible to overtake
Asks about the feasibility of overtaking, implying a consideration of the challenges involved.
FAQs
How can I use "could we overtake" in a sentence?
Use "could we overtake" to ask if it's possible to surpass someone or something. For example, "If we increase our marketing budget, "could we overtake" our main competitor in sales?"
What's the difference between "could we overtake" and "can we overtake"?
"Could we overtake" suggests a possibility or a hypothetical scenario, while "can we overtake" implies a question of ability or permission. "Could we overtake" is more speculative.
What can I say instead of "could we overtake"?
You can use alternatives like "can we pass", "are we able to surpass", or "can we get ahead of" depending on the specific context.
In what contexts is "could we overtake" most appropriate?
"Could we overtake" is suitable in contexts involving competition, progress, or comparison. It's often used in business, sports, and discussions about rankings or performance metrics.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested