Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could prove disastrous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "could prove disastrous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a certain action or decision has the potential to lead to very negative consequences. Example: "If we ignore the warning signs, it could prove disastrous for the entire project."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
Yet such expansion could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Politically, this "racist" strategy could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Keeping all of the land could prove disastrous.
News & Media
"Drilling expansion could prove disastrous for this sensitive environment".
News & Media
Continuing to ignore this fact could prove disastrous.
News & Media
A particularly heavy flood year, Vann fears, could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Should a large storm hit, it could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
4 human-written examples
Analysis by the RSPB, however, suggests cuts might be as much as 23 per cent over the whole budget period, which the society thinks could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Shekau has vowed to disrupt the vote and widespread unrest, especially near polling stations, could prove disastrous.
News & Media
"Four more years on the same political path could prove disastrous".
News & Media
Nevertheless, in Trump's actions (and Netanyahu's cheerleading), Arad fears the loss of fine distinctions, something that could prove disastrous.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "could prove disastrous", ensure the context clearly establishes what actions or conditions could lead to the negative outcome. Provide specific details to enhance the impact of the warning.
Common error
Avoid using "could prove disastrous" for minor inconveniences or situations with limited consequences. Overusing it dilutes its impact and reduces its effectiveness when describing truly significant risks.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could prove disastrous" functions as a qualifying expression, indicating a potential negative outcome. It modifies a preceding action or situation, warning of possible severe consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature.
Frequent in
News & Media
67%
Formal & Business
15%
Science
13%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "could prove disastrous" is a frequently used phrase that serves as a strong warning about potential negative outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. Predominantly found in news and media, but also relevant in formal business and scientific contexts, the phrase effectively communicates the risk of severe consequences. When using the phrase, it's crucial to provide clear context to amplify its impact. Alternatives such as "might have catastrophic consequences" offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
might have catastrophic consequences
Emphasizes the potential for extremely damaging outcomes; uses stronger wording.
could lead to ruin
Focuses on the potential for complete failure or destruction.
might result in calamity
Highlights the possibility of a significant and sudden disaster.
could be devastating
Stresses the potential for widespread destruction and emotional impact.
might end in disaster
Focuses on the potential for a negative conclusion or outcome.
could spell catastrophe
Uses a more dramatic term to emphasize the severity of the potential outcome.
might cause irreparable harm
Highlights the potential for damage that cannot be fixed.
could be extremely damaging
Broadly suggests the potential for significant negative impact.
might trigger a crisis
Focuses on the potential for a sudden and dangerous situation.
could prove to be a fatal mistake
Emphasizes the potential for an irreversible and highly negative error.
FAQs
How can I use "could prove disastrous" in a sentence?
Use "could prove disastrous" to indicate that a specific action or situation has the potential to lead to very negative and damaging consequences. For instance, "Ignoring safety protocols "could prove disastrous" for the entire team".
What are some alternatives to "could prove disastrous"?
Alternatives include "might have catastrophic consequences", "could lead to ruin", or "could be devastating", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "could prove disastrous" or "might prove disastrous"?
Both "could prove disastrous" and "might prove disastrous" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice between them often depends on personal preference or the specific context, with "could" sometimes suggesting a slightly higher probability.
What's the difference between "could prove disastrous" and "could be problematic"?
"Could prove disastrous" indicates a potentially catastrophic outcome, while "could be problematic" suggests a situation that may cause difficulties or issues but not necessarily a complete failure. The former is much stronger in tone and implication.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested