Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could prove difficult

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could prove difficult" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation or task that may present challenges or obstacles. Example: "Completing the project on time could prove difficult due to the unexpected delays."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That could prove difficult in his case.

News & Media

The New York Times

But that could prove difficult.

News & Media

The New York Times

This, however, could prove difficult.

News & Media

The Guardian

Winning the public's approval could prove difficult.

News & Media

The New York Times

But the logistics could prove difficult.

News & Media

The New York Times

Fixing the damaged tunnel could prove difficult.

Controlling the technology could prove difficult.

But avoiding more general inflation could prove difficult.

News & Media

The New York Times

But the movement's success here could prove difficult to replicate.

News & Media

The New York Times

An open and honest accounting could prove difficult.

News & Media

The New York Times

And sequestering the gas underground could prove difficult.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could prove difficult", ensure the context clearly identifies what specific aspect may be challenging. For instance, instead of saying "The task could prove difficult", specify, "The task could prove difficult due to the limited resources".

Common error

Avoid using "could prove difficult" as a vague statement without providing specific details about why something might be challenging. Always elaborate on the potential challenges to maintain clarity and provide valuable insight to the reader.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could prove difficult" functions as a modal verb phrase, expressing a possibility or potential challenge. Ludwig examples confirm its use in assessing future situations and predicting potential difficulties. It indicates that something is not certain but carries a significant likelihood of encountering obstacles.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could prove difficult" is a versatile phrase used to express the potential for challenges or obstacles. As indicated by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and widely accepted, predominantly appearing in news and media contexts. While alternatives such as "might be problematic" or "could be challenging" exist, ensuring specific context and avoiding overuse are key to effective communication. Ludwig's AI confirms its grammatical soundness and common usage, making it a reliable choice for expressing potential difficulties.

FAQs

How can I use "could prove difficult" in a sentence?

Use "could prove difficult" to express a possibility that something might be challenging. For example, "Implementing the new policy "could prove difficult" due to resistance from employees".

What are some alternatives to "could prove difficult"?

Alternatives include phrases like "might be problematic", "could be challenging", or "may present obstacles", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "could be difficult" or "could prove difficult"?

Both "could be difficult" and "could prove difficult" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. "Could prove difficult" often implies a degree of uncertainty and the passage of time before the difficulty becomes evident, while "could be difficult" is a more direct statement of potential challenge.

What's the difference between "could prove difficult" and "will be difficult"?

"Could prove difficult" suggests a possibility or potential for difficulty, while "will be difficult" expresses a higher degree of certainty about the difficulty. The former is used when assessing potential challenges, while the latter is used when those challenges are more predictable or imminent.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: