could not involve

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could not involve" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something is not included or does not participate in a particular situation or context. Example: "The project could not involve any external funding due to budget constraints."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Indeed, many clinicians saw engaging clients as a key barrier to their involvement, saying that they could not involve them if they were not attending sessions and willing to be seen by the service.

BMC Psychiatry

The Kirchners always insisted this could not involve oversight by the IMF, as is customary.

The Economist

"KPMG executives told him he could not involve any other professionals because the investment 'strategy' was 'confidential,' " according to his suit.

The New York Times

It held that where there was authorizing legislation from Congress to raise the militia to respond to an insurrection, the courts could not involve themselves.

The New York Times

"This week, there have been seven fined and this morning, once again … a player that I could not involve in the squad for a different reason decided: 'I don't train today.' He said he had food poisoning.

The Guardian - Sport

Leo Varadkar, the Irish prime minister, told May in a phone call on Monday that "the outcome of any such review could not involve a unilateral decision to end the backstop".

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

One of the key tenets of Christianity is evangelism, and if they said Bible study couldn't involve evangelism, that would be difficult for us".

The New York Times - Magazine

The trip had to be, say, for a humanitarian project or educational purposes or must provide "support for the Cuban people". It couldn't involve beach time designed to improve your tan.

Los Angeles Times

The latter observation implies that the hypothetical incorrect assignment of recent paralogy could not only involve the motif-free ribosomal genes but extend also to their flanking genes.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

"They could not be involved in real estate, and they could not be involved in politics".

The New York Times

How could not being involved be O.K.?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could not involve", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being excluded and why. For example, specify the reasons or constraints preventing involvement.

Common error

Avoid using "could not involve" without specifying the subject that is excluded. Make sure the reason for exclusion is clear to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could not involve" functions as a modal verb phrase, indicating an inability or restriction in including something within a particular action, situation, or context. Ludwig examples show the phrase being used to express limitations, restrictions, or exclusions. The Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could not involve" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express that something was not able to be included or participate in a given context. As indicated by Ludwig, it's a correct and usable phrase. It is commonly found in news, scientific, and formal business settings. While semantically similar alternatives such as "could not include" or "was unable to involve" exist, "could not involve" serves to convey a sense of limitation or restriction. Remember to clearly state what is being excluded and why to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

could not include

Focuses on the act of excluding something from a list or group. Similarity score: 95.

could not encompass

Emphasizes a limitation in scope or coverage. Similarity score: 90.

could not incorporate

Highlights the inability to integrate something into a larger whole. Similarity score: 90.

could not entail

Suggests that something cannot result as a necessary consequence. Similarity score: 85.

was unable to involve

Uses a more formal tone to express the lack of ability to include. Similarity score: 85.

did not permit the involvement of

Emphasizes the lack of permission for someone or something to participate. Similarity score: 80.

precluded the participation of

Formally indicates that something made participation impossible. Similarity score: 80.

did not allow for the inclusion of

Highlights that the circumstances did not create an opportunity for inclusion. Similarity score: 75.

was incompatible with the involvement of

Emphasizes a lack of compatibility that prevented inclusion. Similarity score: 75.

was restricted from involving

Highlights a restriction that limits the act of involving someone or something. Similarity score: 70.

FAQs

What does "could not involve" mean?

The phrase "could not involve" means that something was not able to be included or participate in a particular situation. It suggests a limitation or constraint prevented its inclusion.

How to use "could not involve" in a sentence?

You can use "could not involve" to explain why something wasn't included. For example: "The project "could not involve" external funding due to budget constraints."

What can I say instead of "could not involve"?

You can use alternatives like "could not include", "could not encompass", or "was unable to involve", depending on the context.

Is it different from saying "could not be involved"?

Yes, "could not be involved" usually refers to people or entities that are unable to participate, while "could not involve" refers to the act of including something. For example, "He "could not be involved" because of a conflict of interest" versus "The plan "could not involve" any tax increases".