could not be incorporated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could not be incorporated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that cannot be included or integrated into a larger context, such as a document, project, or system. Example: "Due to the lack of necessary data, the new findings could not be incorporated into the final report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

The board was huge and the MCU could not be incorporated into student-designed boards.

Cornell University

At 71 FR 54397, Sept. 14, 2006, § 180.209 was amended in (a)(1) table 1; however, because of the inaccurate amendatory language, the amendment could not be incorporated.

Cornell University

Such additional extracorporeal support experience could not be incorporated into our analysis.

Annals of Intensive Care

Finally, new items suggested the panels could not be incorporated into the initial questionnaire.

European Journal of Futures Research

Moreover, it could not be incorporated within these categories because of the strong interrelations between adherence and these constructs.

Health Economics Review

PDL could not be incorporated into the FEM model, as the element size was larger than the width of PDL.

Progress in Orthodontics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

9 human-written examples

I think rock music has some limitations, and lots of expressions couldn't be incorporated into rock music in earlier years.

Vice

It's not that they're incompetently directed, or the sets aren't suitably dressed to match the in-game environments, or that any of the actors are having a stinker – it's just that there's precisely no reason why all of the things we see in the show couldn't be incorporated into the game.

Vice

Most of these markers belong to regions for which sequence information is available, but that couldn't be incorporated in the sequence assembly at all (Unknown) or that could be assigned to GGA5, but without a clear location (5_random).

BMC Genomics

First, not all GPs' actions were recorded in a structured way in their EMR and could for that reason not be incorporated in our analyses.

BMC Health Services Research

Second, for all FN events--irrespective of care setting--additional resources that may have been used (e.g., laboratory supplies), and additional services that may have been provided (e.g., drug administration), in the treatment of FN--and that are not included in assumed unit costs/reimbursed values--could not be incorporated due to data limitations.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could not be incorporated", ensure the reason for the inability to incorporate is clear to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify if it's due to technical limitations, data unavailability, or design constraints.

Common error

While "could not be incorporated" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make writing seem indirect. Consider rephrasing to an active voice when appropriate to create a stronger, more direct statement. For example, instead of 'The data could not be incorporated', try 'We could not incorporate the data'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could not be incorporated" functions as a passive construction indicating an inability to include or integrate something within a specific context. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is used across various disciplines.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

Academia

11%

News & Media

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "could not be incorporated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote the inability to include or integrate something into a given context. As Ludwig AI indicates, its presence is particularly prevalent in scientific and academic writing, while also appearing in news and media. When using this phrase, ensure that the reason for exclusion is clearly articulated to avoid ambiguity. Consider rephrasing to active voice for stronger impact if appropriate. Keep in mind alternative formulations like "could not be included" or "could not be integrated" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

could not be integrated

Replaces 'incorporated' with 'integrated', emphasizing a lack of seamless combination.

could not be included

Substitutes 'incorporated' with 'included', highlighting the absence of something from a set or group.

could not be implemented

Replaces 'incorporated' with 'implemented', focusing on the impossibility of putting a plan or system into effect.

could not be added

Replaces 'incorporated' with 'added', stressing the inability to append something to an existing structure.

could not be merged

Substitutes 'incorporated' with 'merged', highlighting the failure to combine two or more things into one.

was unable to be incorporated

Adds 'was unable', emphasizing the lack of ability to incorporate.

could not be assimilated

Replaces 'incorporated' with 'assimilated', suggesting an inability to fully absorb something.

could not be integrated within

Adds 'within' to specify the containing structure or system where incorporation failed.

could not be factored in

Replaces 'incorporated' with 'factored in', emphasizing the inability to consider something in a calculation or plan.

could not be woven in

Substitutes 'incorporated' with 'woven in', stressing the failure to intricately include something.

FAQs

How can I use "could not be incorporated" in a sentence?

You can use "could not be incorporated" to describe something that was impossible to include or integrate into a larger context. For example: "Due to technical limitations, the new feature "could not be incorporated" into the software."

What can I say instead of "could not be incorporated"?

You can use alternatives like "could not be included", "could not be integrated", or "could not be implemented" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "could not be incorporated" or "was not able to be incorporated"?

"Could not be incorporated" is generally more concise and preferred. "Was not able to be incorporated" is grammatically correct but slightly more verbose. The best choice depends on the desired tone and context.

What are common reasons something "could not be incorporated"?

Common reasons include data limitations, technical constraints, design conflicts, or incompatibility issues. Providing the reason clarifies why something "could not be incorporated".