Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could not be excluded

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could not be excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something was not eliminated or ruled out from consideration. Example: "After reviewing all the evidence, it was determined that the possibility of human error could not be excluded."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Particularly for shock tubes, facility effects at temperatures below 1000 K could not be excluded.

Mr. Maher said Mr. Arafat could not be excluded from peace talks.

News & Media

The New York Times

Over Rh/ZrO2 the additional contribution of a direct route to synthesis gas could not be excluded.

Although the chance of that happening was small the possibility "could not be excluded", said the centre.

News & Media

The Guardian

Therefore, malignancy could not be excluded.

Therefore, the possibility of advection could not be excluded.

Hence, type II errors could not be excluded.

For many applications, EFSA concluded that an unacceptable risk was indicated or could not be excluded.

However, due to practical reasons, a treatment bias could not be excluded.

However, conditions mimicking RLS could not be excluded, which may have influenced the results [38, 39].

As discussed previously, a confounding effect of board and wood type could not be excluded.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing potential risks or biases, using "could not be excluded" underscores the limitations of the current findings, promoting transparency and caution in interpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "could not be excluded" when the evidence strongly suggests a different conclusion. Overusing it can create unnecessary ambiguity and weaken your argument; instead, reserve this phrase for situations where genuine uncertainty persists.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could not be excluded" functions as a modal verb phrase used to express a lack of certainty or inability to dismiss a possibility. As Ludwig AI indicates, it conveys that something cannot be definitively ruled out.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

22%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "could not be excluded" is a commonly used modal verb phrase that expresses uncertainty or the inability to dismiss a possibility. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and frequently used in formal and scientific writing, particularly in Science and News & Media contexts. Alternatives like "could not be ruled out" or "cannot be dismissed" offer similar meanings. When employing this phrase, strive for balance: use it to present objective possibilities without overstating certainty, ensuring your writing remains both thorough and credible.

FAQs

How can I use "could not be excluded" in a sentence?

The phrase "could not be excluded" is used to indicate that a possibility or factor cannot be dismissed or ruled out. For example, "The possibility of human error "could not be excluded" from the investigation."

What is a synonym for "could not be excluded"?

A close synonym for "could not be excluded" is "could not be ruled out". Both phrases suggest that something remains a possibility and cannot be ignored.

Is it better to say "could not be excluded" or "was not excluded"?

The choice between "could not be excluded" and "was not excluded" depends on the intended meaning. "Could not be excluded" implies a remaining possibility, while "was not excluded" simply states that something was not actively removed or dismissed.

How does "could not be excluded" differ from "was not included"?

"Could not be excluded" suggests a potential factor that remains viable, whereas "was not included" simply indicates that something was absent or omitted. The former implies possibility, while the latter implies absence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: