Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could have set

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could have set" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express a possibility or hypothetical situation in the past regarding setting something up or establishing a condition. Example: "If we had started earlier, we could have set a new record for the project completion time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"They could have set them free.

News & Media

The Guardian

could have set a better example for my son.

Perrault could have set his fairy tales in these parts.

Were these the best conditions Britain could have set?

News & Media

The Guardian

I could have set it in the financial world.

Alfred Hitchcock could have set a movie here.

He probably could have set up another couple if it had fallen for the right people.

News & Media

Independent

Mass-bombing runs could have set production back but were often inaccurate.

News & Media

Independent

He also said he wished he could have set a better example.

News & Media

The New York Times

England could have set an even bigger target, but slipped from 278-2 to 327-8 327-8

He told me, "I could have set myself up as a guru figure.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "could have set" to express a missed opportunity or a hypothetical past action. For instance, "They could have set a new record if the weather had been better."

Common error

Avoid confusing "could have set" with similar tenses like "could set" or "could be setting". "Could set" implies a present or future possibility, while "could be setting" suggests an ongoing action in the present or future. Only use "could have set" when referring to a past unrealized possibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could have set" functions as a modal verb construction expressing past possibility or speculation. It indicates that an action was possible in the past but did not actually occur. As seen in Ludwig, this construction is commonly used to discuss alternative outcomes or missed opportunities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could have set" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to express past possibilities or hypothetical situations. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples across diverse contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings. The phrase functions as a modal verb construction, often used to evaluate past decisions or suggest alternative actions. While versatile, it's essential to distinguish its meaning from similar tenses and avoid incorrect forms like "could of set".

FAQs

How can I use "could have set" in a sentence?

Use "could have set" to describe a past possibility that did not occur. For example, "The company "could have set" a higher price for the product, but they chose not to."

What is a synonym for "could have set"?

Synonyms include phrases like "might have initiated", "may have started", or "would have created". The best alternative depends on the specific context.

What's the difference between "could have set" and "could set"?

"Could have set" refers to a past possibility that didn't happen, while "could set" refers to a present or future potential. For example, "They "could have set" the alarm last night (but they didn't)" versus "They "could set" the alarm tonight."

Is it correct to say "could of set" instead of "could have set"?

No, "could of set" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "could have set". The confusion arises because "could have" is often contracted to "could've", which sounds similar to "could of".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: