Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could have sent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'could have sent' is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is used to express a past possibility or potential action that did not happen. For example: I could have sent a thank-you card to my aunt, but I forgot.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
might have dispatched
may have forwarded
would have conveyed
should have transmitted
could have dispatched
could have relayed
could have communicated
could have issued
could have mailed
could have responded
could have extended
could have disseminated
could have spent
could have attended
could have recommended
could have mail
could have been transmitted
could have passed on
could have got sent
could have been done
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He could have sent us a signal.
News & Media
"That could have sent him backward.
News & Media
They could have sent you to Mustique!
News & Media
They could have sent me home".
News & Media
"Medicare could have sent a strong signal to drugmakers.
News & Media
You could have sent a letter to the editor.
News & Media
"But he could have sent a representative with more weight.
News & Media
If baseball wanted a novelty, it could have sent Ichiro.
News & Media
We could have sent poets, writers, God forbid, a photographer.
News & Media
A more rigorous referee could have sent Fernandinho off in the first half.
News & Media
They could have sent crews ahead of the storm from all over America.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "could have sent" to express a missed opportunity or a potential action in the past that did not occur. Be mindful of the context to ensure it accurately reflects the intended meaning of a forgone possibility.
Common error
Avoid using "could have sent" when referring to current or future possibilities. It is specifically for hypothetical past actions. For example, don't say "We could have sent the email now"; instead, use "We could send the email now".
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could have sent" functions as a modal verb phrase, expressing a hypothetical past action or a missed opportunity. It indicates that an action was possible in the past but did not occur. Ludwig confirms that this phrase is correct and usable in English.
Frequent in
News & Media
55%
Academia
25%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Science
5%
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "could have sent" is a grammatically sound and commonly used modal verb phrase to express a hypothetical past action that did not occur. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is primarily used to express regret, speculate, or indicate missed opportunities and is frequently found in news, academic, and formal business contexts. When writing, remember that this phrase refers to the past, and consider alternatives like "might have dispatched" or "should have transmitted" to refine your intended meaning. Ensure that you're using it to express past possibilities and not current scenarios to avoid tense errors.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
might have dispatched
Replaces "sent" with "dispatched", implying a more formal or official sending.
could have dispatched
Replaces "sent" with "dispatched", implying a more formal or official sending.
may have forwarded
Substitutes "sent" with "forwarded", suggesting the transmission of something already received.
should have transmitted
Emphasizes the obligation to send something, which wasn't fulfilled, using "transmitted".
would have conveyed
Replaces "sent" with "conveyed", implying a more deliberate or planned delivery.
could have relayed
Substitutes "sent" with "relayed", suggesting the passing on of information or a message.
could have shipped
Replaces "sent" with "shipped", suggesting items are sent physically.
might have beamed
Substitutes "sent" with "beamed", suggesting items are sent with radio waves.
could have communicated
Broadens "sent" to "communicated", implying a wider range of transmission methods.
could have issued
Replaces "sent" with "issued", often used for official documents or statements.
FAQs
How can I use "could have sent" in a sentence?
"Could have sent" indicates a past possibility that did not happen. For example, "I "could have sent" the package yesterday, but I forgot" shows a missed opportunity.
What's the difference between "could have sent" and "should have sent"?
"Could have sent" implies a possibility, while "should have sent" implies an obligation or recommendation. "I "could have sent" the letter" means I had the option. "I should have sent the letter" means it was advisable to send it.
What are some alternatives to "could have sent"?
Depending on the context, alternatives include "might have dispatched", "may have forwarded", or "would have conveyed". Choose the alternative that best fits the nuance of your sentence.
Is "could have sent" grammatically correct?
Yes, "could have sent" is grammatically correct. It uses the modal verb 'could' in the past perfect tense to express a hypothetical past action. Just ensure the context accurately reflects this past hypothetical scenario.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested