Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could have built

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could have built" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express a possibility or hypothetical situation in the past regarding construction or creation. Example: "If we had more resources, we could have built a better facility."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He could have built the gateway.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Dombrowski, perhaps, could have built a stronger bullpen.

The Blue Devils could have built off that.

Perhaps so, but he could have built this place anywhere.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I could have built this for $850 million," he said.

The police could have built a case despite her.

CRS says it could have built 150 more had Israel not barred most wood imports.

News & Media

Independent

"With all the technology available today, they could have built a kiosk," Kendall said.

In time, perhaps, he could have built a strong relationship with another management team.

People seem to like the place.Walt Disney could have built his biggest theme park anywhere.

News & Media

The Economist

We could have built on the North Side or the suburbs, but this is home".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context clearly indicates what "could have built" refers to, avoiding ambiguity. For example, specify what could have been built: "They could have built a school."

Common error

Avoid using "could of built" which is a common misspelling. The correct form is "could have built".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could have built" functions as a modal verb construction expressing past possibility or potential. It indicates that an action (building something) was possible but did not occur. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could have built" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to express past possibilities that did not materialize. Ludwig AI confirms its standard usage in various contexts. It's frequently found in news and media, indicating hypothetical scenarios or missed opportunities. To use it effectively, ensure the context is clear and avoid common errors like "could of built". Consider alternatives such as "might have constructed" or "were capable of constructing" to add nuance to your writing. Understanding these aspects will help you leverage "could have built" with precision and clarity.

FAQs

How can I use "could have built" in a sentence?

Use "could have built" to describe something that was possible in the past but did not happen. For instance, "If they had secured funding, they "could have built" a community center".

What are some alternatives to "could have built"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "might have constructed", "were capable of constructing", or "would have been able to build".

Is it correct to say "could of built" instead of "could have built"?

No, "could of built" is incorrect. The correct phrasing is "could have built". "Have" is often contracted to "'ve" in speech, which might lead to the error in writing.

What's the difference between "could have built" and "were able to build"?

"Could have built" implies a possibility that wasn't realized, while "were able to build" suggests the ability was present and the action was actually carried out or was certain to be carried out. For example, "They could have built a bridge, but they didn't get the permits" vs. "They were able to build the bridge after securing the permits".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: