could be stricken

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could be stricken" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that something may be removed or deleted, often referring to text or provisions in a document. Example: "The clause regarding penalties could be stricken from the contract if both parties agree."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Mr. Conrad said provisions could be stricken from the measure if they were judged not to have direct budgetary impact, potentially limiting the scope of the legislation.

The New York Times - Health

If the strike persists, every series that relies on writers could be stricken, not just "The Office" on NBC or "Grey's Anatomy" on ABC but also "Curb Your Enthusiasm" and "Mad Men" and "Damages" on cable.

The New York Times - Arts

Harsh questioning by conservative Supreme Court justices Tuesday sparked concern that the health care reform law's individual mandate could be stricken.

Huffington Post

Imagine living with the knowledge that inside your brain you carried a flaw that meant that you could be stricken with Alzheimer's as early as age 45, or even earlier.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

But the results could be striking.

The Economist

But both parties suggested a compromise could be struck.

The New York Times

But deals could be struck behind the scenes.

The New Yorker

He could be struck off if the claims are proven.

The Guardian

Mr. Reid said he believed a deal could be struck.

The New York Times

The changes he will make could be striking.

The New York Times

A deal could be struck within two weeks, they said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "could be stricken" when referring to the potential removal of specific items, clauses, or elements from a formal document or plan. Ensure the context clearly indicates what is being considered for removal.

Common error

Avoid using "could be stricken" in casual conversation or informal writing. It's better suited for formal or legalistic settings. Simpler alternatives like "removed" or "deleted" are more appropriate in informal contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be stricken" functions as a passive construction indicating a possibility or potential action. It suggests that something is liable to be removed or deleted. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness and usability, highlighting its passive voice.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could be stricken" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate the potential for something to be removed, particularly from formal documents or agreements. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, noting its passive construction. While relatively rare in general usage, it is most commonly found in news and media contexts. For more casual writing, simpler alternatives may be preferred. The examples provided by Ludwig showcase its typical usage in discussions of legal or procedural modifications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

may be deleted

Indicates a potential deletion, directly replacing "stricken" with a synonym.

might be removed

Suggests a possibility of removal, similar to "could be stricken", but uses more common vocabulary.

could be rescinded

Implies a formal cancellation or revocation, suitable for laws or policies.

could be cancelled

Expresses the possibility of an event or agreement being terminated.

could be repealed

Specifically refers to the possibility of a law or regulation being revoked.

might be invalidated

Suggests the possibility of being declared void or without legal force.

may be erased

Highlights the possibility of complete removal or obliteration.

might be taken away

Suggests the possibility of something being removed or confiscated.

could be affected by

Indicates the possibility of being influenced or changed by something.

may be afflicted with

Focuses on the possibility of being affected by a disease or problem.

FAQs

How can I use "could be stricken" in a sentence?

You can use "could be stricken" to indicate the possibility of something being removed from a document or agreement. For example, "The clause regarding penalties "could be stricken" from the contract if both parties agree".

What phrases are similar to "could be stricken"?

Similar phrases include "might be removed", "may be deleted", or "could be rescinded". The best choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "could be stricken"?

"Could be stricken" is most appropriate in formal or legal contexts when discussing the potential removal of a clause, item, or section from a document. It is less suitable for informal conversation.

What is the difference between "could be stricken" and "could be removed"?

While both phrases indicate the possibility of removal, "could be stricken" carries a more formal tone and is often used in legal or official settings. "Could be removed" is more general and can be used in a wider range of contexts.