could be repealed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could be repealed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the possibility of a law, regulation, or policy being revoked or annulled. Example: "The new legislation is controversial and many believe it could be repealed if enough public opposition arises."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

That means they could be repealed before anyone could take advantage of most of them.

The New York Times

A Pentagon report concluded that the law could be repealed at a low risk to the military's effectiveness.

The New York Times

"I think there is a chance they could be repealed if the party in power changes," he said.

The Guardian

If Obama is elected, the policy could be repealed altogether, allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military.

The Guardian - Opinion

State powers that intrude on the civil rights of trade unionists, protesters and ethnic minorities could be repealed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Under the proposed "repeal amendment," any federal law or regulation could be repealed if the legislatures of two-thirds of the states voted to do so.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

One parliament cannot bind another, so the act could simply be repealed if there were a majority for doing that.

The Guardian

Franklin D. Roosevelt believed that Social Security could never be repealed because all workers invested in it and all shared an interest in its continuation.

The New York Times

LinkedIn also adopted a provision in its charter requiring that its staggered board provision could only be repealed by 80 percent of its votes.

The New York Times

Last Friday, Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asserted at the Senate Armed Services Committee that Mr. Bremer's immunity order could not be repealed by the interim government that took office yesterday.

The New York Times

Olson and Boies didn't get everything they wanted from the Supreme Court, which declined to find a broad constitutional right to same-sex marriage, but they were able to convince the Justices that marriage equality could not be repealed by referendum in California.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could be repealed", ensure the context clearly indicates the conditions or potential events that might lead to the repeal. For example, specify the political climate or public opinion that could influence the decision.

Common error

Avoid using "could be repealed" without specifying what could be repealed. Be clear about the law, regulation, or policy in question to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be repealed" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating the possibility or potential for a law, regulation, or policy to be revoked or annulled. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Wiki

18%

Science

17%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "could be repealed" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate the possibility of revoking or annulling a law, regulation, or policy. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. Analysis of its usage reveals that it is most frequently found in News & Media and Wiki articles, suggesting a neutral register suitable for discussing potential legal and political changes. When using this phrase, clarity and specificity are crucial to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "might be rescinded" or "can be revoked" offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

might be rescinded

Implies a formal cancellation, often of a law or agreement. Focuses on the act of taking back something previously granted or enacted.

may be overturned

Suggests a legal or judicial reversal of a decision or law. More specific to legal contexts.

can be revoked

Emphasizes the authority to take back a permission or privilege. Highlights the power dynamic.

could be nullified

Indicates that something could be made void or ineffective. Emphasizes the lack of legal force.

might be abolished

Suggests a complete end to a system or practice. Stronger than repealed, implying a more fundamental change.

may be invalidated

Implies that something may be declared legally unsound. Focuses on legal standing.

can be cancelled

A more general term for stopping something from happening or being valid. Lacks the specific legal connotation of "repealed".

could be reversed

Focuses on the action of changing something back to its previous state. Suitable for decisions or policies.

might be withdrawn

Suggests that something could be taken back or removed, often in a formal setting. Implies a deliberate action.

may be discontinued

Implies that something could be stopped or ended. Suggests a more gradual or less forceful termination.

FAQs

How do I use "could be repealed" in a sentence?

Use "could be repealed" to indicate that a law, regulation, or policy has the possibility of being revoked or annulled. For example: "The controversial law "could be repealed" if public opposition grows.".

What can I say instead of "could be repealed"?

You can use alternatives like "might be rescinded", "can be revoked", or "may be overturned" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "could be repealed" or "could be abolish"?

"Could be repealed" is generally used for laws or regulations, while "might be abolished" suggests a complete end to a system or practice. The choice depends on the specific context.

What's the difference between "could be repealed" and "could be amended"?

"Could be repealed" means the complete removal of a law or policy, whereas "could be amended" means making changes or revisions to it. Repealing is a more drastic action than amending.