Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could be named

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could be named" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential names or titles for something that has not yet been definitively named. Example: "The new species discovered in the rainforest could be named after the scientist who found it."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Barack Obama could be named as reasons.

P31 Daily Mirror Celebrity 'threesome' couple could be named today.

News & Media

The Guardian

"However, a donor could be named as providing upkeep".

News & Media

The New York Times

Their strategy could be named after San Antonio, the state's second-most-populous city.

News & Media

The Economist

Rubino also said he believed Paterno could be named in civil lawsuits.

The high court ruled last Friday that Prince Nasser could be named.

News & Media

The Guardian

They could be named as a party in a lawsuit, even if they did nothing wrong.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It would be nice if the park could be named after him".

News & Media

The New York Times

Non-compliers could be "named and shamed" by such a commission.

Coughlin said additional captains could be named on a game-by-game basis.

News & Media

The New York Times

The committees could be named Stone (Society to Over-regulate Nearly Everything).

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "could be named" to express possibility, not certainty. If the naming has already occurred, use "was named" or "is named".

Common error

Avoid using "could be named" when the subject has already been officially named. This creates confusion; instead, opt for "is named" or "was named" to denote the definitive naming.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be named" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating a possibility or potential for something to receive a specific name. Ludwig examples show its use in various contexts, from naming species to designating roles.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

24%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "could be named" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate the possibility of something receiving a name. Ludwig confirms that the expression is correct and usable in written English. It's versatile and suitable for various contexts, including news, science, and general discussions. However, it's important to differentiate its meaning from phrases like "is named" which denote a definitive naming. When using "could be named", ensure the context clearly indicates the potential naming authority and the possibility, not certainty, of the naming event.

FAQs

How can I use "could be named" in a sentence?

Use "could be named" to express the possibility of something receiving a particular name. For instance, "The new species of frog "could be named" after its discoverer."

What are some alternatives to "could be named"?

You can use phrases like "might be called", "may be identified as", or "could be designated as" as alternatives depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "could be named" or "should be named"?

"Could be named" expresses possibility, while "should be named" expresses obligation or recommendation. Use "could be named" when discussing potential names and "should be named" when suggesting a name is appropriate or deserved.

What's the difference between "could be named" and "is named"?

"Could be named" indicates a potential future naming, whereas "is named" indicates that the naming has already occurred and is a current fact. For example, "The park "could be named" after the founder," versus "The park "is named" 'Founder's Park'.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: