Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could be involved

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"could be involved" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to suggest a possible scenario or outcome. For example, "The police are continuing to investigate the cause of the fire, and criminal involvement could be involved."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

About 500,000 could be involved.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Neighboring countries could be involved".

News & Media

The New York Times

The RAF could be involved, too.

News & Media

The Guardian

Other compounds made by bacteria could be involved as well.

News & Media

The New York Times

The police hinted that Muslim rebels could be involved.

News & Media

The New York Times

Thousands of genes could be involved.

News & Media

Forbes

Thus, several mechanisms could be involved in our results.

This protein could be involved in fungal cell wall hydrolysis.

We hypothesized that MIF could be involved in preeclampsia.

The decision maker could be involved to choose a finite set C ¯ in Step 1.

Thus, ROS such as ·OH could be involved in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "could be involved" when you want to suggest a possibility without stating it as a certainty. It's useful in contexts where evidence is incomplete or speculative.

Common error

Avoid using "could be involved" repeatedly in close proximity without providing supporting details or context. Overuse can weaken your argument and make your writing sound speculative rather than informative.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be involved" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing possibility or speculation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It suggests that someone or something might have a connection or participation in a particular situation, without stating it as a certainty.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "could be involved" is a versatile phrase used to express possibility or speculation regarding a connection or participation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, and its frequent appearance in both scientific and news contexts demonstrates its widespread applicability. When using this phrase, ensure it aligns with the level of certainty and evidence available, and avoid overuse to maintain clarity and impact in your writing. Consider alternatives like "might be implicated" or "may be connected" to add nuance and precision to your expression.

FAQs

How to use "could be involved" in a sentence?

Use "could be involved" to suggest a possible, but not definite, connection or participation. For example, "Several factors "could be involved" in the decision-making process."

What can I say instead of "could be involved"?

You can use alternatives like "might be implicated", "may be connected", or "potentially participate" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "could be involved" or "may be involved"?

Both "could be involved" and "may be involved" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning of possibility. The choice depends on stylistic preference, although "could" might suggest a slightly lower probability than "may."

What's the difference between "could be involved" and "is involved"?

"Could be involved" suggests a possibility or speculation, while "is involved" states a fact. Use "is involved" when there's definitive evidence of participation or connection.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: