could be included

USAGE SUMMARY

"could be included" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it when suggesting something may be included in a particular situation. For example: "The costs for this project could be included in the budget."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Results Twenty-one patients could be included.

The Journal of Pediatrics

"Any health care item could be included.

The New York Times

Are there further figures/tables that could be included?

Yale University

In all, 172 patients could be included in the analyses.

Addictive Behaviors

Turkey could be included under two possible situations.

The New York Times

The renminbi could be included, Ms. Lagarde said.

The New York Times

Certainly someone of Mr. Annan's stature could be included.

The New York Times

Additional purposes that could be included are determining chilling system efficiency and evaluating product quality.

Cornell University

The results could be included in the Urban Regulations of Camagüey.

Building and Environment

Available information could be included in the model through the prior distribution.

Expert Systems with Applications

Only 14% of the patients could be included in the study.

Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could be included", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being considered for inclusion and the basis for that consideration.

Common error

Avoid using "could be included" without specifying the criteria or conditions for inclusion. This can lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation. Always clarify the prerequisites or factors that determine whether something "could be included".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be included" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing possibility or suggestion. It indicates that something has the potential to be added or incorporated, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

27%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "could be included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to suggest a possibility or option for inclusion. Ludwig confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts, it serves to introduce potential additions without committing to a firm decision. When using this phrase, ensure the inclusion criteria are clear to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "might be added" or "may be incorporated" offer nuanced ways to express similar ideas.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

might be added

Suggests a slightly lower probability or intention than "could be included".

may be incorporated

Implies a more formal or structured inclusion process.

can be integrated

Focuses on the seamless combination of elements.

is eligible for inclusion

Highlights meeting the requirements for being included.

is a candidate for addition

Emphasizes the potential for adding something.

is a possibility for integration

Highlights the potential nature of something being incorporated.

is potentially includable

Describes something as being able to be included.

is open to be added

Indicates that the option to include something is still available.

is under consideration for addition

Indicates that inclusion is being thought about but not decided.

is being considered for integration

Suggests an ongoing evaluation of the possibility of integrating something.

FAQs

How can I use "could be included" in a sentence?

Use "could be included" to suggest a possibility or option for something to be part of a larger set or system. For example, "The new feature "could be included" in the next software update".

What are some alternatives to using "could be included"?

You can use alternatives like "might be added", "may be incorporated", or "can be integrated" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "could be included" instead of "should be included"?

"Could be included" suggests a possibility or option, while "should be included" implies a recommendation or necessity. Use "could be included" when exploring options, and "should be included" when advocating for something.

What's the difference between "could be included" and "can be included"?

"Could be included" suggests a possibility or a suggestion, whereas "can be included" indicates a capability or permission. For example, "This item "can be included" if it meets the requirements" implies eligibility, while "This item "could be included" to improve the design" suggests a potential enhancement.