Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could be detected
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "could be detected" is correct and usable in written English.
It is an example of the modal verb "could," which is used to express possibility or suggest a course of action. For example, you could say "Strains of harmful bacteria could be detected in the water supply."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
can be detected
may be noticed
might be observed
can be identified
can be ascertained
could be demonstrated
could be selected
could be located
could be identified
could be ascertained
could be manufactured
could be determined
could be investigated
could be discovered
could be decided
could be extracted
could be discerned
could be designated
could be conducted
could be traced
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
In this way any future emendation could be detected.
Encyclopedias
Enteritidis could be detected.
Science
It could be detected again today.
News & Media
No metabolites could be detected.
Science
Interesting relationships could be detected.
Synergistic effects between gums could be detected.
However, no permeation selectivity could be detected.
Science
No cerebral aneurysm could be detected.
No Cx subpopulation could be detected.
Science
High differences could be detected in productivities.
Science
No consistent nerve damage could be detected.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "could be detected", ensure the context clearly specifies the method or means by which the detection is possible. For instance, specify "could be detected using advanced imaging techniques" for clarity.
Common error
While "could be detected" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak or vague. Consider rephrasing to active voice where appropriate. For example, instead of "The error could be detected", try "The system could detect the error".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could be detected" functions as a modal passive construction. It expresses the possibility or potential for something to be identified or discovered. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability across various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
78%
News & Media
14%
Encyclopedias
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "could be detected" is a grammatically correct and frequently used modal passive construction that expresses the possibility of identifying or discovering something. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is widely applicable, particularly in scientific and technical contexts. While its formal register makes it suitable for academic writing, it's essential to avoid overusing passive voice and to specify the means of detection for clarity. Alternatives such as "can be identified" or "might be observed" can offer nuanced variations in meaning, but the core function remains consistent: to indicate potential for discovery.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
can be identified
Replaces "could" with "can", suggesting a stronger possibility or certainty of identification.
may be noticed
Substitutes "detected" with "noticed", implying a more subtle or incidental discovery.
might be observed
Uses "observed" instead of "detected", indicating a more formal or scientific observation.
is potentially identifiable
Emphasizes the potential for identification, using a more descriptive and less direct construction.
is possibly discernible
Replaces "detected" with "discernible", suggesting a more nuanced or perceptive level of identification.
can be ascertained
Indicates the possibility of confirming or verifying something, shifting the focus to confirmation.
is capable of being sensed
Focuses on the ability to perceive something, highlighting the sensory aspect of detection.
can potentially be spotted
Uses "spotted" instead of "detected", indicating a more casual or visual form of discovery.
has the possibility of being found
Emphasizes the chance of finding something, using a more verbose and less direct construction.
presents the likelihood of discovery
Shifts the focus to the probability of discovery, using a more formal and abstract expression.
FAQs
How can I use "could be detected" in a sentence?
Use "could be detected" to indicate that something has the potential to be discovered or identified, such as "Strains of harmful bacteria "could be detected" in the water supply".
What's the difference between "could be detected" and "can be detected"?
"Could be detected" implies possibility or potential, while "can be detected" suggests a higher degree of certainty or current capability. For example, something "can be detected" suggests the ability already exists.
What are some alternatives to "could be detected"?
You can use alternatives like "may be noticed", "might be observed", or "can be identified" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
In what contexts is "could be detected" most appropriate?
"Could be detected" is suitable in contexts where you want to express the potential for discovery, often in scientific, technical, or investigative scenarios. It suggests a possibility rather than a certainty.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested