Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

could be changing

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "could be changing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is in the process of changing or has the potential to change in the future. Example: "The weather patterns in this region could be changing due to climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That could be changing as the marketplace for television business news heats up.

News & Media

The New York Times

That could be changing.

News & Media

The New York Times

The situation could be changing.

But things could be changing.

News & Media

The Guardian

That attitude could be changing.

News & Media

The New York Times

That, however, could be changing.

News & Media

The New York Times

"His voice could be changing".

News & Media

The New Yorker

This could be changing.

But this, after Iraq, could be changing.

News & Media

The Economist

That scientific bias could be changing, however.

News & Media

The Economist

But that dynamic could be changing.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "could be changing", consider adding context to clarify the direction or nature of the change. This helps the reader understand the potential implications.

Common error

Avoid using "could be changing" when the change is already confirmed or evident. In such cases, a more direct statement of fact is appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "could be changing" functions as an auxiliary verb combined with a present continuous form. This combination expresses a potential or ongoing process of transformation. Ludwig AI highlights the usage of this phrase across diverse domains, reinforcing its role in indicating possibilities and developments.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

14%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "could be changing" serves as a versatile tool for expressing potential or ongoing transformation. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various domains, including news, academia, and science. The phrase's neutral register makes it adaptable to diverse communicative contexts. When using "could be changing", it's important to consider the certainty of the change and provide adequate context to clarify the nature of the potential shift. Related phrases, such as "might be evolving" or "may be shifting", offer nuanced alternatives for expressing similar ideas. Ultimately, "could be changing" is employed to indicate a state of potential or ongoing evolution rather than a definitive and confirmed transformation.

FAQs

How can I use "could be changing" in a sentence?

Use "could be changing" to express that something is in a state of potential or ongoing transformation. For example, "The political landscape "could be changing" due to recent events".

What are some alternatives to "could be changing"?

Alternatives include phrases like "might be evolving", "may be shifting", or "is potentially transforming", each carrying a slightly different nuance.

Which is correct, "could be changing" or "is changing"?

"Could be changing" implies a possibility or ongoing process, while "is changing" suggests a more definite and present transformation. The choice depends on the degree of certainty you want to convey.

What's the difference between "could be changing" and "could change"?

"Could be changing" describes an ongoing process of transformation, while "could change" suggests a potential but not necessarily current shift. The former emphasizes the process, the latter the possibility of a future state.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: