Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
could be categorized
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"could be categorized" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is often used to suggest that something can be placed in one or more particular categories. For example: "This type of fruit could be categorized as either a citrus or a tropical fruit."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(15)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Or athletes could be categorized by skill level.
News & Media
Theoretically, athletes could be categorized by size, as they are in wrestling and boxing.
News & Media
Before the season, Howard could be categorized as a good player with a Superman gimmick — one that Shaquille O'Neal had claimed as his own.
News & Media
Existing methods could be categorized into two main approaches.
The N2 adsorption on the surface of SrFe12O19 could be categorized as multilayer adsorption.
Science
The status of worker capacity could be categorized as normal, capacity constrained worker and bottleneck.
More than 90% of the interventions could be categorized using the NIC.
Science
Most responses could be categorized as a tree, a list or a network.
The existing techniques for oil spillage remediation could be categorized as biological, chemical, and mechanical methods.
As a result, six studies could be categorized as low risk of bias.
Science
Field measurement method could be categorized into two type, viz., destructive and nondestructive biomass estimation methods.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "could be categorized", ensure that the criteria for categorization are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether items are being categorized by size, color, function or other relevant criteria.
Common error
Be specific when categorizing. Avoid creating categories that are too broad, as this can render the classification meaningless. Instead of a general category like "miscellaneous", break it down into more specific and useful groupings.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "could be categorized" functions as a passive verb phrase expressing the potential for something to be assigned to a specific class or group. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable expression. This implies a level of possibility or suggestion rather than a definitive classification.
Frequent in
Science
62%
News & Media
27%
Formal & Business
11%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "could be categorized" is a versatile and commonly used expression to suggest a potential classification or grouping. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Predominantly used in scientific and academic contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. The analysis reveals that while perfectly acceptable, careful consideration should be given to defining the criteria for categorization to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "could be classified" or "could be grouped" offer subtle differences in meaning, allowing for a more nuanced expression. By understanding its function, purpose, and context, writers can effectively leverage "could be categorized" to convey their intended meaning with precision.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
could be classified
Emphasizes a structured and formal system of grouping.
could be grouped
Highlights the act of forming collections or sets.
could be labeled
Focuses on assigning a descriptive term or identifier.
could be designated
Suggests a formal assignment or appointment to a category.
could be identified
Highlights the recognition of something belonging to a certain category.
could be assigned
Focuses on allocating items into predefined categories.
could be sorted
Emphasizes the orderly arrangement into different classes.
could be arranged
Focuses on systematic placement within categories.
could be divided
Highlights the separation into distinct groups or classes.
could be distinguished
Emphasizes the ability to recognize differences between categories.
FAQs
How can I use "could be categorized" in a sentence?
You can use "could be categorized" to suggest that something belongs to a particular group or class based on certain characteristics. For example, "These findings "could be categorized" as preliminary results".
What are some alternatives to saying "could be categorized"?
Alternatives include "could be classified", "could be grouped", or "could be labeled", depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use "could be categorized as" or "could be categorized into"?
Both "could be categorized as" and "could be categorized into" are grammatically correct, but the choice depends on the context. "Could be categorized as" is used when describing the category itself, while "could be categorized into" is used when describing the different groups within the categorization.
What's the difference between "could be categorized" and "can be categorized"?
"Could be categorized" implies a possibility or suggestion, while "can be categorized" implies a more definite or established classification. The choice depends on whether you're presenting a potential categorization or a standard one.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested