cost-effective for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost-effective for" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is efficient and does not cost a lot of money. Example: "This new software program is highly cost-effective for small businesses, as it helps streamline operations and save money on manual tasks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

40 human-written examples

It is not cost-effective for production of biofuel.

The New York Times

The route was cost-effective for truckers, but it had frustrated city residents for years.

The New York Times

Convenient, low-cost outpatient treatment is better for patients and cost-effective for society.

The New York Times

Nice decides on whether medicines are cost-effective for the NHS to buy.

The Guardian

"AT&T promised to tell their consumers which plan would be most cost-effective for them.

The New York Times

Some house designs might not be practical or cost-effective for aging in place.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

20 human-written examples

"It's more cost effective for us to have one set of emissions everywhere".

The New York Times

Negative ads may be cost effective for politicians, but they are rare in the auto industry.

The New York Times

Is routine antibiotic prophylaxis cost effective for total joint replacement patients?

Harvard University

"Many would not consider this cost effective for the gain seen," she said.

The New York Times

Cyanobacterial biofertilizers are eco-friendly and cost effective for farmlands.

Botanical Studies

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Quantify the benefits whenever possible to strengthen your claim that something is "cost-effective for" a particular purpose or group. Use data and metrics to demonstrate the value being delivered relative to the cost.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the "cost-effective for" aspect without providing concrete data or comparisons. If you cannot demonstrate tangible benefits or savings, it weakens your argument and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost-effective for" functions as a modifier, specifically an adjectival phrase followed by a preposition. It describes a quality of something (being cost-effective) and specifies who or what benefits from this quality. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cost-effective for" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to describe something that provides good value relative to its cost for a specific beneficiary. As Ludwig AI highlights, this expression is commonly used. Analysis of the provided examples reveals its prevalence in news, scientific, and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure you provide evidence or context to support your claim. Remember to avoid exaggeration and clearly identify the intended beneficiary to maximize clarity. Related phrases, such as "economical for" or "efficient for", can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

economical for

Focuses more on the monetary savings or efficiency in resource use.

efficient for

Emphasizes the optimal use of resources to achieve a desired outcome, not specifically about cost.

budget-friendly for

Highlights affordability and suitability for those with limited financial resources.

worth the expense for

Implies that the benefits justify the cost, even if it's significant.

a good value for

Suggests a favorable balance between price and quality or usefulness.

provides a return on investment for

Focuses on the financial gains or benefits derived from an initial expenditure.

gives the best bang for the buck for

An informal way of saying the most value is received for the money spent.

sensible for

Highlights the rationality and prudence of a decision or course of action.

prudent for

Suggests that something is wise and well-judged in terms of resources and planning.

viable for

Indicates that something is practical and feasible in relation to its costs and benefits.

FAQs

How can I use "cost-effective for" in a sentence?

You can use "cost-effective for" to describe something that provides good value or benefits in relation to its price. For example, "This marketing strategy is "cost-effective for" small businesses".

What are some alternatives to "cost-effective for"?

Alternatives include "economical for", "efficient for", or "budget-friendly for", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "cost-effective for" or "cost effective to"?

"Cost-effective for" is generally used to indicate who or what benefits from the cost-effectiveness, while "cost effective to" isn't commonly used. "Cost-effective in" can also be used to describe in what respect the subject is cost-effective.

What's the difference between "cost-effective for" and "efficient for"?

"Cost-effective for" specifically relates value to monetary cost, while "efficient for" emphasizes optimal use of resources to achieve an outcome, not exclusively financial savings.