cost of developing

USAGE SUMMARY

"cost of developing" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it whenever you refer to the amount of money it takes to develop something, such as a product or plan. Example: "The cost of developing a new marketing strategy was too expensive for the company to justify."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The cost of developing medications is soaring.

MIT Technology Review

The cost of developing new drugs has gone up.

The New York Times

The cost of developing products like fighter aircraft is huge.

The New York Times

So has the cost of developing and manufacturing them.

The Economist

And the cost of developing new drugs is rocketing.

The Economist

The cost of developing the system was $0.25 mil.

Evaluation and Program Planning

The cost of developing such an infrastructure may prove prohibitive without far larger government incentives.

The New York Times

Even before the formal launch, there is the cost of developing, planning and specifying the scheme.

The Guardian - Business

Especially when the cost of developing, manufacturing and advertising a new toy is so high.

The New York Times

The marginal costs -- the extra cost of developing another DVD -- is almost nothing.

The New York Times

The companies will share the cost of developing the products in Europe and the United States.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "cost of developing", be specific about what aspects are included (e.g., labor, materials, research).

Common error

Avoid underestimating the "cost of developing" by failing to account for indirect expenses like marketing, legal fees, or maintenance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost of developing" functions as a noun phrase, specifically a gerund phrase. It acts as a subject, object, or complement in a sentence, referring to the expense associated with the process of developing something. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "cost of developing" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, as affirmed by Ludwig AI, referring to the expenses associated with a developmental process. It functions as a noun phrase and is versatile across news, science, and business contexts. While direct and informative, it is important to be precise by specifying the aspects that form the "cost of developing". Alternatives like "price of developing" and "development expenses" can be used for semantic variety. Understanding its function and potential pitfalls ensures clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

price of developing

Replaces "cost" with "price", maintaining similar meaning.

development costs

Emphasizes the costs incurred during development.

outlay for developing

Uses 'outlay' as a synonym for cost, implying an expenditure.

development expenses

Focuses on the expenditure aspect of development.

budget for developing

Refers specifically to the allocated budget.

expenditure for development

More formal and emphasizes the act of spending for development.

funds allocated for development

Highlights the allocation of financial resources.

financial burden of developing

Highlights the negative impact or difficulty associated with the cost.

investment in development

Presents the cost as an investment rather than an expense.

resources required for development

Focuses on resources rather than direct monetary cost.

FAQs

How to use "cost of developing" in a sentence?

You can use "cost of developing" to describe the financial resources needed for a project. For example, "The "cost of developing" the new software was higher than expected".

What can I say instead of "cost of developing"?

You can use alternatives like "price of developing", "development expenses", or "financial burden of developing" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "cost of developing" or "cost for development"?

"Cost of developing" focuses on the ongoing process, while "cost for development" is more general. The best choice depends on the specific context.

What's the difference between "cost of developing" and "investment in developing"?

"Cost of developing" is a neutral term, while "investment in developing" suggests that the expense is expected to yield future benefits.