cost of deterring

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost of deterring" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the expenses or resources required to prevent certain actions or behaviors, often in contexts like crime prevention or military strategy. Example: "The government must consider the cost of deterring criminal activity when allocating funds for law enforcement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The cost of deterring them is high.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Second, an increase in the number of firms tilts the relative composition of each firms' demand towards non-local consumers and enhances the effects of search costs on deterring the initiation and extensiveness of any search activity.

European Economic Review

To the many Taiwanese who balk at spending $18 billion on America's proposed arms package, offensive weapons seem a more cost-effective way of deterring an attack.Taiwan has been working for several years to develop supersonic cruise missiles that could hit mainland targets.

The Economist

I got to thinking that publicising stories like that about Australian native fauna might be a more cost-effective way of deterring asylum seekers than naval operations to turn them back and offshore detention centres that threaten to make their lives a living hell.

The Guardian

Don't let the cost of service deter you from picking reliable and dependable service.

WikiHow

How do we create enough of a potential cost to deter Max Baucus, Kent Conrad, Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, or any of the other Democratic obstructionists from using the threat of supporting a Republican filibuster to gut the best opportunity for health care reform in forty years?

Huffington Post

The Senate majority is also working on other bills designed to provide a more equitable solution to the insurance crisis by reducing the cost of litigation and deterring insurance fraud.

The New York Times

> Ants can reduce the cost of herbivory by deterring or preying upon insects and vertebrate herbivores.

AoB PLANTS

If the current high cost of borrowing deters private investment, the government will have little scope to offer a public alternative.

The Economist

Haliassos and Bertaut (1995) and Bertaut (1998) also identify the role of information costs in deterring stock market participation.

SERIEs

Instead, Trump has been raging at the FBI for what he perceives to be a fixation on the Russia investigation at the cost of failing to deter the attack.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use specific numerical data when discussing "cost of deterring" if it's possible to give specific expenses or budgets, making your argument more persuasive and transparent.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about the "cost of deterring" without specifying the context or the methods of deterrence. Such generalizations lack credibility and fail to provide useful information. Always provide specifics about what is being deterred and how.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost of deterring" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies and quantifies the expenses associated with preventative measures. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cost of deterring" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase that refers to the financial implications associated with preventative actions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is commonly found in news, science, and business contexts, serving to inform and analyze the expenses of discouraging specific behaviors or events. When using this phrase, clarity is key: avoid broad generalizations and always provide specifics about what is being deterred and how. Alternatives such as "deterrence expenses" or "price of prevention" can provide subtle variations in tone and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deterrence expenses

This alternative uses a noun phrase to directly indicate expenses related to deterrence, focusing on brevity.

price of prevention

This alternative uses a more general term, "prevention", instead of "deterrence", offering a slightly broader scope.

expense of discouraging

This alternative replaces "deterring" with "discouraging", providing a synonymous but less formal phrasing.

outlay for preclusion

This alternative uses more formal vocabulary like "outlay" and "preclusion", suitable for academic or technical contexts.

resources spent on avoidance

This alternative focuses on the "resources" aspect, highlighting what is being used to achieve avoidance.

investment in preventative measures

This alternative reframes the cost as an "investment", suggesting a beneficial return in preventing negative outcomes.

financial burden of dissuasion

This alternative emphasizes the "burden" aspect, highlighting the potentially heavy financial impact of dissuasion.

fiscal implications of thwarting

This alternative employs formal terms like "fiscal implications" and "thwarting", making it appropriate for economic or policy discussions.

budget for impediment

This alternative uses "budget" to specify financial planning and "impediment" which means something that impedes

funds allocated to forestalling

This alternative uses "funds allocated" which has an accountancy overtone and "forestalling" which has a proactive element of stopping in advance.

FAQs

How can I use "cost of deterring" in a sentence?

You can use "cost of deterring" when discussing the financial implications of preventing something, such as "The government must consider the "cost of deterring" cyberattacks when allocating its budget."

What are some alternatives to "cost of deterring"?

Alternatives include "deterrence expenses", "price of prevention", or "expense of discouraging", depending on the specific context and level of formality you require.

Is it better to say "cost to deter" or "cost of deterring"?

"Cost to deter" is more suitable when referring to a specific action, while "cost of deterring" is better for discussing the general expense of a deterrence strategy or effort. For example, "the "cost to deter" the attack" versus "the "cost of deterring" future attacks".

What factors influence the "cost of deterring"?

Factors influencing the "cost of deterring" include the scale and scope of the threat, the methods used for deterrence, the resources available, and the perceived value of what is being protected.