cost consequences for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost consequences for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the financial implications or effects of a particular action or decision. Example: "The new policy will have significant cost consequences for the company, affecting our overall budget."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

The realistic cost consequences for the local commissioning group are an estimated saving of about £100 000 a year.

Acupuncture in Medicine

Using realistic assumptions, the cost consequences for the local commissioning group are an estimated saving of £100 000 a year.

Acupuncture in Medicine

The model took differences in BSI rates and the associated cost consequences for the hospital into account.

Critical Care

Respiratory tract infections, the most common infectious diseases in humans, have large health and cost consequences for individuals and for the public.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

These three data sources will provide sufficient data to inform a detailed analysis of the downstream cost consequences for the different treatment groups.

BMC Geriatrics

Severe sprains may have a range of direct cost consequences across primary and secondary health care, they may also have cost consequences for patients themselves in terms of their personal expenditure and return to work.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Given the magnitude of the protective effect in the systematic review, the ongoing uncertainty about benefits at later gestational ages, the serious health and cost consequences of cerebral palsy for the child, family and society, a trial of magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth between 30 to 34 weeks' gestation is both important and relevant for clinical practice globally.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Given the magnitude of the protective effect in the systematic review, the ongoing uncertainty about benefits at later gestational ages, the serious health and cost consequences of this condition for the child, family and society a trial of magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth between 30 to 34 weeks' gestation is both justifiable and needed.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Conversion to the 7-11 rule would also require builders to draw new plans, resubmit approvals and account for the land cost consequences of enlarging the basic building footprint.

Los Angeles Times

If there were significant differences, these could have cost consequences and implications for the optimal use of available NHS resources, as well as for the further development of regional services.

British Journal of Cancer

An ideal source of unit costs for the cost consequences analysis would be a comparative in-country study with contemporaneous controls that collects relevant cost data.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "cost consequences for" when you want to emphasize the financial outcomes linked to specific actions or policies. Make sure the connection between the action and the cost is clear to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "cost consequences" when referring to non-financial impacts such as environmental or social effects. While these can indirectly affect costs, specify the type of consequence if it is not primarily monetary.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost consequences for" functions as a noun phrase, specifically denoting the financial or economic results arising from a particular action, decision, or policy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and usable in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cost consequences for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to highlight the financial impacts of actions, decisions, or policies. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is perfectly acceptable. It's most frequently found in scientific, news, and formal business contexts, emphasizing its relevance across various domains. When using the phrase, ensure clarity about who bears the costs and differentiate it from broader non-financial implications. Alternatives such as "financial implications for" or "economic ramifications of" can be used to add nuance, but keep in mind that "cost consequences for" is most effective when directly addressing financial outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

financial repercussions of

This alternative focuses on the financial impact, using stronger language.

economic ramifications of

This alternative emphasizes the broader economic effects.

fiscal implications for

This option highlights the fiscal or budgetary effects.

budgetary impact on

This phrase directly addresses the effect on a budget.

price ramifications for

This alternative centers on the pricing and associated outcomes.

financial burden on

This phrase emphasizes the financial strain or load caused.

monetary effects on

This option is a more direct and simple way to express the monetary impact.

expenditure implications of

This phrase highlights the effects on spending or expenses.

economic toll on

This alternative uses stronger language to express the negative economic impact.

cost-related outcomes for

This option provides a general reference to cost-related results or effects.

FAQs

How can I use "cost consequences for" in a sentence?

You can use "cost consequences for" to describe the financial impacts or effects of a decision or event. For example, "The new regulations will have significant "cost consequences for" small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "cost consequences for"?

Some alternatives include "financial implications for", "economic ramifications of", or "fiscal impact on", depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "cost consequences for" and "financial implications for"?

"Cost consequences for" generally refers to the direct financial results of something, while ""financial implications for"" can encompass a broader range of financial effects, including indirect ones.

What is the most appropriate context to use "cost consequences for"?

The phrase "cost consequences for" is suitable in contexts where you need to emphasize the specific financial outcomes resulting from particular actions or policies, particularly in fields like economics, business, or healthcare.