corroborating details for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corroborating details for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the need for additional information or evidence to support a claim or statement. Example: "The researcher is looking for corroborating details for the theory presented in the paper."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Her identity was eventually leaked to the media, and she subsequently spoke on the record to The Washington Post, which also reported on corroborating details of her allegations.

University of Chicago

WASHINGTON -- The lawyer for the Chicago woman who has accused Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of inappropriate sexual conduct on Monday was bringing forward a witness who could provide the first corroborating details of Sharon Bialek's claims.

Huffington Post

He said he was struck by the absence of corroborating details in the news accounts of Mr. Hernandez's confession.

The New York Times

But it takes on an especial poignancy when the subjects themselves posted corroborating details to a network that they helped construct.

TechCrunch

Few corroborating details were available for those who were described solely as "militants".

Vice

You might even lie: "Why were your fingerprints found on that gun?" When the suspect finally admits to the crime, you praise him for owning up and press for corroborating details.

The New Yorker

Add details for texture.

WikiHow

In addition to the application itself, Ms. Krasner said, most boards will require income and financial information, with corroborating evidence for every item.

The New York Times

No corroborating evidence for this event existed.

The New York Times - Health

There is no corroborating evidence for this, and Thai police have dismissed the idea.

The Guardian

Mr. Bloomberg was also asked if he would require corroborating evidence for his company to investigate a rape accusation.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "corroborating details for", ensure that the details genuinely support the claim they are intended to reinforce. Vague or tangentially related information weakens your argument.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two details exist together, one necessarily corroborates the other. Corroboration requires a direct and logical connection demonstrating that one detail strengthens the validity of the other.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corroborating details for" functions as a descriptor, specifying the type of details required to support a particular claim or piece of evidence. It pinpoints the need for specifics that strengthen the validity of something else.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "corroborating details for" is grammatically correct and used to emphasize the need for specific evidence that supports a claim. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is acceptable for use. It’s best suited for contexts requiring verification and factual backup, fitting well in professional or academic settings. While no examples were found, keep in mind that substitutes like "supporting evidence for" or "confirming data for" exist, allowing for slight variations in emphasis. Be careful not to confuse correlation with actual corroboration.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Verifying details for

Similar, with a slight emphasis on checking the accuracy of the information.

Supporting evidence for

Focuses on the evidence that backs up a claim, rather than the specifics.

Corroborating evidence to

Similar to the original, but using 'to' instead of 'for' which changes the grammatical relationship slightly.

Confirming data for

Emphasizes the numerical or factual information that validates something.

Confirming specifics to

Related, but placing importance to the confirmation of the specifics.

Validating information for

Highlights the act of proving something to be true or accurate.

Substantiating facts for

Stresses the factual basis that lends credibility to a statement.

Verifying facts to

Focuses on ensuring the veracity of the facts.

Authenticating specifics for

Focuses on verifying particular details as genuine or legitimate.

Additional support for

Indicates further backup or reinforcement of an existing point.

FAQs

How can I use "corroborating details for" in a sentence?

You can use "corroborating details for" to indicate that you are looking for specific information to support a claim or statement. For example, "The detective needed "corroborating details for" the witness's testimony."

What's a good substitute for "corroborating details for"?

Alternatives include "supporting evidence for", "confirming data for", or "validating information for", depending on the specific context. Each alternative subtly shifts the emphasis.

Is it better to say "corroborating details for" or "corroborating evidence for"?

"Corroborating details for" emphasizes specific pieces of information, while "corroborating evidence for" refers to broader supporting proof. The best choice depends on whether you're highlighting particular facts or a general body of support.

What does "corroborating details for" mean?

The phrase "corroborating details for" means specific facts or pieces of information that support or confirm the truth or validity of a statement, claim, or theory.