corresponds to

USAGE SUMMARY

"corresponds to" is correct and can be used in written English.
It means that something has a close relationship or connection with something else. For example: "The location of the store corresponds to the map provided."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Corresponds to Fig 1d.

Nature

Corresponds to Figure 4c.

Nature

This corresponds to identification.

Cornell University

This corresponds to authentication.

Cornell University

Video corresponds to Fig. 2c.

Nature

Video corresponds to Fig. 4a.

Nature

Video corresponds to Fig. 3b.

Nature

Spot 4 corresponds to UreB.

Nature

Video corresponds to Fig. 1d.

Nature

White locus corresponds to edn3.

Nature

Video corresponds to Fig. 2a.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "corresponds to", ensure that the relationship you're describing is clear and direct. Avoid ambiguity by specifying the exact nature of the correspondence.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because one thing "corresponds to" another, it necessarily causes it. Correlation does not equal causation; further evidence is needed to establish a causal link.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponds to" functions as a relational verb phrase, connecting two elements by indicating a relationship of equivalence, similarity, or mapping. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and widely used. Examples from Ludwig show its use in scientific contexts, such as "Spot 4 corresponds to UreB."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

Academia

24%

News & Media

15%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "corresponds to" is a grammatically sound and commonly used relational verb phrase. It signifies a direct relationship, equivalence, or predictable mapping between two entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is fit for use in written English. It appears frequently in scientific and academic contexts, with notable presence in news media as well. Its purpose is to establish a clear link and its formality ranges from neutral to formal. Related phrases include "is equivalent to", "matches with", and "aligns with". Best practice involves ensuring the relationship is clear and direct, while common errors include confusing correlation with causation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is equivalent to

Suggests a direct, interchangeable relationship, focusing on equality in value or meaning.

matches with

Indicates a harmonious pairing or alignment, emphasizing a fit between two elements.

aligns with

Highlights agreement or parallelism, suggesting a shared direction or purpose.

is analogous to

Emphasizes a similarity in function or structure, useful for drawing comparisons between different domains.

is in agreement with

Indicates a state of concurrence or harmony, often used in formal or official contexts.

relates to

Suggests a connection or association, highlighting a link between two subjects or ideas.

is associated with

Points out a correlation or connection, often used when one thing is statistically linked to another.

is proportional to

Highlights a mathematical relationship where one quantity changes in direct relation to another.

is functionally equivalent to

Focuses on performing the same task or having the same effect, regardless of differences in form.

reflects

Indicates that something mirrors or represents something else, emphasizing a correspondence in characteristics.

FAQs

How can I use "corresponds to" in a sentence?

Use "corresponds to" to show a direct relationship or equivalence between two things. For example: "The rise in temperature "corresponds to" an increase in sea levels."

What are some alternatives to "corresponds to"?

Alternatives include "is equivalent to", "matches with", or "aligns with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "correspond with" instead of "corresponds to"?

"Correspond with" implies communication or being similar, whereas "corresponds to" indicates a direct relationship or equivalence. Use "correspond with" when referring to exchanging letters or resembling in character, and "corresponds to" for direct associations.

What's the difference between "corresponds to" and "is related to"?

"Corresponds to" suggests a more direct and specific relationship, often implying a one-to-one mapping or equivalence. "Is related to", on the other hand, is a broader term that indicates a connection but not necessarily a direct correspondence. For instance, "the key "corresponds to" this lock" implies a precise match, while "smoking "is related to" lung cancer" suggests a correlation but not necessarily a direct equivalence.