corresponding to

USAGE SUMMARY

"corresponding to" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used to compare two or more elements of a sentence whose relationship is close. For example: He used the corresponding tool corresponding to the job.

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Imaging data corresponding to blinks were discarded.

Nature

No crater corresponding to the extinction has been located.

The New York Times - Science

corresponding to the 3 PANIC observation epochs.

Harvard University

corresponding to the apartments they have.

Stanford University

corresponding to which synapses to stimulate.

Yale University

corresponding to the particular type of aircraft.

University of California, Berkeley

Minispheres corresponding to ~ 2000 I.U.

European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

(b) Optical micrograph of an active sample corresponding to a.

Nature

corresponding to free 5-fluorindole, and another at −123.62 ppm.

Nature

See Fig. S7 for CMIP5 results corresponding to these panels.

Nature

The preparation method was corresponding to that used for exenatide.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "corresponding to" when you want to show a clear relationship or equivalence between two distinct items. Be sure the relationship is direct and easily understood by the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "corresponding to" when the relationship is not direct or obvious. Instead, use phrases like "related to" or "associated with" for more nuanced connections.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponding to" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, indicating a relationship of equivalence or direct association between two elements. Ludwig indicates that the phrase is correct and widely used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

33%

Science

33%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Unknown/unmatched sources

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "corresponding to" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to establish a direct relationship or equivalence between two elements. Ludwig confirms its correctness and wide applicability in written English. It is particularly prevalent in academic and scientific writing, as well as news and media. When using this phrase, ensure that the relationship is clear and direct. For more nuanced connections, consider alternatives such as "related to" or "associated with". By understanding its function and appropriate contexts, you can effectively use "corresponding to" to enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equivalent to

Expresses a direct equivalence or sameness in value or function.

related to

Indicates a connection or association, but may not imply direct equivalence.

associated with

Suggests a connection or link, often implying a cause-and-effect or correlation relationship.

in relation to

Highlights the connection or comparison between two things.

aligned with

Emphasizes agreement or conformity with a standard or objective.

matching with

Focuses on the similarity or identity between two things.

consistent with

Indicates that something is in agreement or harmony with something else.

in accordance with

Highlights the compliance or conformity with a set of rules, standards or laws.

attributable to

Points to the cause or origin of something.

reflective of

Indicates that something is representative or indicative of something else.

FAQs

How to use "corresponding to" in a sentence?

Use "corresponding to" to show a direct relationship or equivalence between two things. For example: "The data corresponding to that year is missing."

What can I say instead of "corresponding to"?

You can use alternatives like "equivalent to", "related to", or "associated with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "corresponding to" or "corresponds with"?

"Corresponding to" and "corresponds with" have similar meanings but slightly different usages. "Corresponding to" shows a direct relationship, while "corresponds with" implies a match or agreement. For most cases, "corresponding to" is preferred for clarity.

What's the difference between "corresponding to" and "similar to"?

"Corresponding to" indicates a direct equivalence or relationship, whereas "similar to" implies a resemblance without necessarily being equivalent. Use "corresponding to" for direct matches and "similar to" for resemblances.