corresponding for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase “corresponding for” is not correct and would not be used in written English.
A more appropriate phrase would be “corresponding to” or “corresponding with”. For example, “He spent the next week corresponding with his colleagues to gather more information.”.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

Among the GHs, GH2 that corresponds for glucuronidase and GH3 corresponding for L-arabinofuranisidase, B-D-glucosidase and B-D-xylopyranosidase activities were the most abundant.

BMC Genomics

We have been corresponding for the last 30 years.

The New York Times

At that time, they had been corresponding for almost forty years.

The New Yorker

We had been corresponding for four years but had never met.

The New Yorker

I had come here to California to meet Green after corresponding for a little while by email.

The Guardian - Books

We've been corresponding for months and met a few weeks ago.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

For corresponding results for the Poisson model see Table S1.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

They would have dollar costs for the insurance companies and corresponding benefits for patients.

The New York Times

The salary for federal district judges would rise to $218,000 from $165,200, with corresponding increases for appellate judges and Supreme Court justices.

The New York Times

The corresponding phases for building a voice?

The New York Times - Arts

There are no corresponding rights for citizens.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "corresponding for" in formal writing; instead, use "corresponding to" or "corresponding with" for grammatical accuracy.

Common error

A common mistake is to use the wrong preposition after "corresponding". Always double-check that you are using "to" or "with" instead of "for".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponding for" attempts to link two elements, suggesting a relationship or equivalence. However, this usage is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests alternatives like "corresponding to" or "corresponding with" for accurate communication.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "corresponding for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct alternatives are "corresponding to" and "corresponding with", which accurately convey the intended relationship or connection between elements. Using the incorrect phrase can undermine the credibility of your writing and should be replaced with one of the suggested alternatives to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. Always prioritize correct preposition usage to maintain the integrity of your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

corresponding to

Changes the preposition to create a grammatically correct phrase.

corresponding with

Uses a different preposition to indicate a relationship or similarity.

corresponds to

Modifies the phrase to use a verb form indicating a direct relationship.

is equivalent to

Indicates that the terms or items being related are equal in value or meaning.

is related to

Indicates a general connection without specifying a precise correspondence.

associated with

Highlights a connection or association between two or more things.

aligns with

Implies that items or ideas match or agree with each other.

is in agreement with

Suggests that different elements are consistent or harmonious with each other.

is analogous to

Indicates that a comparison can be drawn between the items.

matches with

Emphasizes a similarity in nature between the items being related.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "corresponding" in a sentence?

The word "corresponding" is correctly used with the prepositions "to" or "with", depending on the intended meaning. For example, "The rise in demand corresponds to an increase in supply" or "I am corresponding with several colleagues about the project".

What can I use instead of "corresponding for"?

Instead of the incorrect phrase "corresponding for", use the phrases "corresponding to" or "corresponding with" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Which is correct: "corresponding to" or "corresponding with"?

Both "corresponding to" and "corresponding with" are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Corresponding to" indicates a direct relationship or equivalence, while "corresponding with" suggests communication or interaction.

Is "corresponding for" ever acceptable in written English?

No, the phrase "corresponding for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. It is best to avoid using it.