correctly recognized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "correctly recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something has been identified or acknowledged in an accurate manner. Example: "The software was able to accurately and correctly recognize the voice commands given by the user."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Gisela correctly recognized it as bona fide Champagne, and gave it a mildly enthusiastic thumbs up.

The New York Times

Washington and Western European leaders quickly and correctly recognized Mr. Kostunica's victory.

The New York Times

The Bush administration has correctly recognized that unilateral action is unlikely to make a difference.

The New York Times

Either way, The Times would keep alive a story that the public correctly recognized as insubstantial.

The New York Times

This means that every touch was correctly recognized by the 16-feature DNN model.

Nature

The subject's score is the number of correctly recognized forms in a total of 40 trials.

Nature

The results showed that native regional accent was correctly recognized for 79% of the speakers.

Speech Communication

In keeping with previous aproaches13,45, we focus below on contextual memory for correctly recognized items (i.e., hits).

Nature

"The court correctly recognized that the government created this crisis, and it's the government's responsibility to ensure that all people in Flint have access to safe drinking water".

The Guardian

Both designs have in common that brain activity elicited by correctly recognized studied (old) items is compared to brain activity elicited by correctly rejected new items.

Cognitive Brain Research

By 11 months, infants correctly recognized pitch-matched and – mismatched words in English but only recognized tonal matches in Mandarin Chinese.

Cognition

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "correctly recognized", ensure that the context clearly indicates the criteria for correctness. This adds clarity and strengthens the statement's validity.

Common error

Avoid using "correctly recognized" without specifying what constitutes 'correct'. Vague usage weakens the impact and leaves room for misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "correctly recognized" functions as an adverbial modifier followed by a verb, indicating the manner in which an action (recognition) is performed. It describes that the recognition was accurate and in accordance with established facts or standards, as supported by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

29%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "correctly recognized" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that signifies accurate identification or acknowledgement. According to Ludwig, it functions as an adverbial modifier followed by a verb and primarily serves to assert the accuracy of an identification. Its usage is particularly prevalent in scientific and news contexts, as well as business contexts, reflecting a need for precision and clarity. While the phrase is considered correct, it's essential to ensure the context clearly defines the criteria for correctness to prevent vagueness and enhance the statement's impact. Considering the information provided by Ludwig, understanding these nuances can help writers effectively and accurately convey their intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accurately identified

Emphasizes the precision and exactness of the identification.

precisely identified

Highlights accuracy and without error.

properly acknowledged

Focuses on the appropriate acceptance and recognition of something.

positively identified

Expresses the affirmation that the identification was exact.

rightfully acknowledged

Highlights the just or deserved nature of the recognition.

appropriately identified

Highlights that it was identified in an appropriate way or within an appropriate setting.

validly identified

Stresses that identification is sound, well-founded, and aligns with established procedures.

effectively identified

Identified something in a way that it generated results.

legitimately recognized

Focuses on lawfulness and accordance with accepted rules.

soundly recognized

Emphasizes the rational basis of identification.

FAQs

What does "correctly recognized" mean?

The phrase "correctly recognized" means that something has been identified or acknowledged accurately and in accordance with established facts or criteria.

What can I say instead of "correctly recognized"?

You can use alternatives like "accurately identified", "properly acknowledged", or "rightfully acknowledged" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How do you use "correctly recognized" in a sentence?

You can use "correctly recognized" in a sentence like this: "The software "correctly recognized" the address from the voice input."

What's the difference between "accurately identified" and "correctly recognized"?

"Accurately identified" emphasizes precision in the identification process, while "correctly recognized" highlights acknowledgement that aligns with established facts or criteria. They are often interchangeable but have subtle differences.