corrected to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corrected to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been amended or adjusted to a specific version or form. Example: "The document was corrected to reflect the latest changes in policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Corrected to April 1, 1938".

Yale University

This has been corrected to 1920s.

The Guardian - Opinion

So South corrected to four spades.

The New York Times

And South corrected to four hearts.

The New York Times

That has been corrected to proportional voting.

The Guardian

This has been corrected to Ipsos Mori.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This has now been corrected to 2007.

The Economist

This has been corrected to 79%.

The Guardian

This has been corrected to say Ofqual.

The Guardian

That has been corrected to 48 weeks.

The Guardian

This has been corrected to former editor.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "corrected to", ensure the original statement and the correction are clearly identified to provide context and avoid confusion.

Common error

Avoid stating only the corrected information without mentioning the initial error. This can leave readers unaware of the change and potentially misinformed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corrected to" functions as a marker of error rectification, indicating that a previous statement or piece of information has been found inaccurate and subsequently amended. This function is clearly demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, where errors in dates, figures, or descriptions are explicitly addressed and corrected.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

72%

Academia

14%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "corrected to" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that an error has been rectified. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, academic, and scientific domains, to ensure accuracy and clarity. When using this phrase, it's best practice to clearly identify both the original error and the corrected information to provide full context. While alternatives like "amended to" or "revised to" exist, "corrected to" specifically emphasizes the rectification of a mistake.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adjusted to

Emphasizes a slight change or adaptation to fit a new condition or standard.

amended to

Focuses on formal changes, often in legal or official documents.

revised to

Highlights a more thorough review and alteration, suggesting a significant improvement.

updated to

Indicates a change to include the most recent information or standards.

changed to

A general term for any alteration or modification, without specifying the nature of the change.

modified to

Suggests a structural or functional alteration, often for a specific purpose.

altered to

Similar to "changed to", but may imply a less drastic modification.

adapted to

Implies a change to make something suitable for a new use or situation.

converted to

Indicates a transformation from one form or system to another.

edited to

Focuses on changes made to text or media to improve clarity or accuracy.

FAQs

How is "corrected to" used in a sentence?

The phrase "corrected to" is used to indicate that an error has been identified and rectified. For example, "The initial report stated the budget was $1 million, but this has been "corrected to" $1.2 million."

What are some alternatives to "corrected to"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "amended to", "revised to", or "updated to" as alternatives to "corrected to".

What's the difference between "corrected to" and "changed to"?

"Corrected to" implies fixing an error, while "changed to" simply indicates an alteration without necessarily implying an initial mistake. For instance, a policy might be "changed to" reflect new priorities, but a factual error would be "corrected to" the right information.

When should I use "corrected to" instead of "edited to"?

Use "corrected to" when rectifying an inaccuracy or mistake. Use "edited to" when referring to changes made for style, clarity, or length without necessarily fixing an error. For example, "The manuscript was "edited to" improve readability, and the factual error was "corrected to" ensure accuracy."