controversial evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence "controversial evidence" is correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase refers to evidence that is highly debated or disputed by different parties. Example: The defense team presented controversial evidence in the trial, causing the jury to carefully consider the validity of their arguments.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

In other policy issues such as the environment or moral topics, tentative and controversial evidence prevails.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Controversial evidence even suggests that the Polynesians brought chickens to South America (Storey et al., 2007) long before Columbus set foot on the continent.

The Guardian

His comments follow those made in April by the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, before the election that no extra Gonski money would be allocated to schools, citing controversial evidence that funding increases had not improved educational outcomes.

The Guardian

There is controversial evidence regarding the levels of antioxidant molecules in type 2 diabetes periodontitis patients.

Archives of Oral Biology

There is controversial evidence on a matrix influence on the measurement of NT-proBNP.

Clinical Biochemistry

This contrasts with our analysis, which concluded controversial evidence based on an association reported by Cote et al. [23].

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Nevertheless there are still controversial evidences about NPs translocation through the alveolar barrier.

BioMed Research International

Controversial evidences about the role of those miRNAs in oncogenesis are reported in several studies.

BMC Cancer

On the basis of these still controversial evidences, the American Heart Association and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended to use CRP as a risk marker for cardiovascular diseases in individual with a Framingham risk score between 10% and 20% (Pearson et al 2003).

Clinical interventions in aging

They were hugely popular before the credit crisis and hugely controversial, amid evidence that many firms let borrowers inflate their salaries to obtain bigger home loans.

The Guardian - Money

They were popular before the credit crisis and controversial, amid evidence that many firms let borrowers inflate their salaries to obtain bigger home loans.

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Clearly state the source of the "controversial evidence" and any potential biases or limitations associated with it.

Common error

Avoid presenting "controversial evidence" as definitive proof. Instead, frame it as evidence that is subject to debate and requires further investigation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "controversial evidence" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "controversial" modifies the noun "evidence". It typically serves to characterize a particular piece of evidence as being subject to debate, disagreement, or challenges. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "controversial evidence" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It describes evidence subject to debate and disagreement. Its primary function is to characterize and introduce contentious information, often requiring careful consideration and balanced discussion. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, the phrase necessitates a neutral to formal tone. When using this phrase, acknowledging opposing viewpoints and source limitations is crucial. Alternatives include ""disputed evidence"" and ""questionable evidence"". The phrase is very commonly encountered.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disputed evidence

Focuses on the fact that the evidence is challenged or argued against.

questionable evidence

Emphasizes doubt regarding the reliability or validity of the evidence.

debatable evidence

Highlights that the evidence is open to discussion and differing opinions.

contested evidence

Stresses that the evidence is actively being fought over or challenged.

conflicting evidence

Indicates that the evidence contradicts other existing evidence.

dubious evidence

Suggests a strong sense of skepticism or disbelief towards the evidence.

paradoxical evidence

Implies that the evidence presents a self-contradictory or illogical situation.

contradictory evidence

Similar to conflicting, but may suggest a more direct opposition within the evidence itself.

unsubstantiated claims

Shifts focus to the lack of support or proof for assertions made.

tenuous proof

Suggests the evidence is weak and easily challenged.

FAQs

How can I use "controversial evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "controversial evidence" to describe findings that are disputed or debated within a particular field. For example: "The study presented "controversial evidence" suggesting a link between the two.".

What is an alternative to saying "controversial evidence"?

Alternatives include "disputed evidence", "questionable evidence", or "debatable evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What makes evidence "controversial"?

Evidence is considered "controversial" when it is subject to strong disagreement, debate, or challenges regarding its validity, interpretation, or implications. This can occur due to conflicting studies, methodological flaws, or differing theoretical perspectives.

How should I handle "controversial evidence" in my writing?

When discussing "controversial evidence", acknowledge the differing perspectives and limitations of the evidence. Provide context, cite sources, and avoid presenting the evidence as absolute truth. Acknowledge that there is "conflicting evidence" too.