contributed directly to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "contributed directly to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a clear and immediate impact or involvement in a particular outcome or result. Example: "Her research contributed directly to the development of a new vaccine."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mental health crises contributed directly to dozens of police-involved deaths.

The Guardian

Cornell contributed directly to this work, he says even before he enrolled as a student.

Cornell University

Such differences contributed directly to the disintegration of the second Yugoslavia.

Britannica

Compare that with the $100 contributed directly to the provider of social services in year one.

Harvard Business Review

The offensive line's woes have contributed directly to Eli Manning's lack of production.

The New York Times - Sports

(Not in the data was how technology contributed directly to this).

The New York Times

The ensuing revolution in Eastern Europe contributed directly to the downfall of the Soviet Empire.

The Economist

3. What recent events contributed directly to Mr. Berlusconi's resignation and resolve to create a new government?

The New York Times

In addition, it is possible that the combination of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity and sorption contributed directly to plume deceleration.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

At Lehman Brothers, for example, mortgage-related businesses contributed directly to record revenue and income over the last three years.

The New York Times

It has galvanised jihadists, becoming their "cause célèbre", and it has contributed directly to increasing recruitment of violent Islamist terrorists.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "contributed directly to" when you want to emphasize a clear and immediate cause-and-effect relationship. This phrase avoids ambiguity about the level of influence.

Common error

Avoid using "contributed directly to" when the effect is indirect or the contribution is minor. This phrase implies a significant and immediate impact, so ensure the context supports this claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "contributed directly to" functions as a causal connector, indicating that one thing had a significant and immediate influence on another. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for expressing direct cause-and-effect relationships.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

32%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Academia

6%

Wiki

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "contributed directly to" serves as a causal connector, effectively establishing a direct and significant link between an action or event and its consequence. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriateness for conveying clear cause-and-effect relationships. With a high frequency across news, scientific, and encyclopedic sources, it demonstrates versatility and formality. When using this phrase, ensure that the context supports the claim of a direct and substantial impact. Remember to consider alternatives like "led straight to" or "played a key role in" for nuanced expressions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was the direct cause of

Emphasizes that something immediately preceded and triggered a specific outcome.

directly influenced

Focuses on the impact and sway something had on another.

had a direct impact on

Highlights the immediate effect something had on a situation.

led straight to

This phrase implies a more immediate and linear connection between cause and effect.

was directly responsible for

Indicates accountability for a specific result or consequence.

played a key role in

Emphasizes the significance of the contribution to the overall outcome.

was instrumental in

Highlights the essential role something played in achieving a particular result.

was a major factor in

Indicates that something was a significant, though not necessarily the sole, cause.

had a hand in

Suggests involvement or influence, but can be less direct than the original phrase.

facilitated

Focuses on easing and supporting a resulting process.

FAQs

How to use "contributed directly to" in a sentence?

Use "contributed directly to" to show a clear cause-and-effect relationship. For example, "His research "contributed directly to" the development of the new vaccine."

What can I say instead of "contributed directly to"?

You can use alternatives like "led straight to", "was instrumental in", or "played a key role in" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "contributed directly to" or "contributed indirectly to"?

Both phrases are correct, but they indicate different levels of influence. "Contributed directly to" implies a clear and immediate impact, while "contributed indirectly to" suggests a less immediate or secondary influence.

What's the difference between "contributed directly to" and "resulted in"?

"Contributed directly to" emphasizes the role of something in causing an outcome, while "resulted in" focuses solely on the outcome itself. You can use ""contributed directly to"" to highlight the influential factor.