contested by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "contested by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when something is being argued against or challenged. For example: "The recent policy was contested by several academics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Jordan's claim was contested by Israel.

The Guardian - Opinion

This is contested by Express KCS.

The Guardian

The rules had been contested by the business community.

The New York Times

This is the largest merger ever contested by the agency.

The Economist

That was contested by Mr Djokovic and Spain's Rafael Nadal.

The Economist

Of those, 751 names are contested, by 231 applicants.

The Economist

The appeals are being contested by home secretary, Theresa May.

The Guardian

The "energy poverty" argument is contested by Adani's critics.

The Guardian

Each shot was contested by the suddenly energized Pacers.

The New York Times - Sports

This has been contested by academics and civil society groups.

The Guardian

The man's estate is being contested by his two widows.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "contested by" to clearly indicate when a claim, idea, or result is being challenged or disputed by a specific entity. This adds precision and clarifies the source of the disagreement.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on the passive construction with "contested by". Sometimes, an active voice construction can make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The results were contested by the researchers", consider "The researchers contested the results".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "contested by" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating that a statement, claim, or action is being challenged or opposed by a particular entity. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "contested by" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed prepositional phrase that indicates disagreement or challenge. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability across diverse writing styles. It is most commonly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, showcasing its versatility and neutrality. When employing "contested by", ensure clarity by specifying the entity doing the contesting and consider using active voice constructions for more direct writing. Alternatives such as "challenged by" or "disputed by" can add nuance, while avoiding overuse in passive voice improves writing quality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

challenged by

Emphasizes the act of questioning or disputing something.

disputed by

Highlights the existence of a disagreement or debate.

questioned by

Focuses on the act of doubting or raising concerns about something.

challenged through

Implies a more active and potentially confrontational form of disagreement using a particular mean.

called into question by

Indicates that something has been doubted and its validity or accuracy is now uncertain.

met with opposition from

Highlights the resistance or disapproval faced by something from a particular source.

subject to debate by

Emphasizes that something is being discussed and argued over.

argued against by

Focuses on the presentation of reasons or evidence against something.

faces disagreement from

Highlights that an entity has encountered difference of opinion.

is under contention by

Indicates that something is currently being disputed or argued over.

FAQs

How to use "contested by" in a sentence?

Use "contested by" to show that a claim or idea is being challenged. For example, "The election results were "contested by" the opposing party."

What can I say instead of "contested by"?

You can use alternatives like "challenged by", "disputed by", or "questioned by" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "contested by" or "disputed by"?

Both "contested by" and "disputed by" are correct and can be used interchangeably in many situations. The choice depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Contested by" suggests a formal challenge, while "disputed by" indicates a disagreement.

What's the difference between "contested by" and "protested by"?

"Contested by" implies a formal challenge or dispute, often within a legal or structured setting. "Protested by", on the other hand, suggests a more public and expressive form of objection, often involving demonstrations or public statements.