conspicuous omission

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conspicuous omission" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that has been noticeably left out or excluded, often implying that the omission is significant or important. Example: "The report had a conspicuous omission regarding the financial projections, which raised concerns among the stakeholders."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Now Kramer simply ignores that critique, making his book's conspicuous omission all the more telling.

The New York Times

But they did not actually show him doing anything, a conspicuous omission.

The New York Times

The conspicuous omission revived simmering concerns among investors about the tense relations between Viacom's two leaders.

The New York Times

There was one conspicuous omission from the Patriotic Celebration: any mention of President Bush or the Iraq war.

The New York Times - Magazine

The most conspicuous omission was Madikizela-Mandela, his wife of 38 years during the struggle against racial apartheid.

The Guardian

The most conspicuous omission was that of the team's former captain Andrei Arshavin, who currently plays for Arsenal in England's Premier League.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

These were not the most conspicuous omissions, however.

The New Yorker

Reading it, one gets a vivid sense of Brunetti's tastes — and, through the book's conspicuous omissions, his distastes.

The New York Times - Books

There aren't as many conspicuous omissions as in previous years – partly because the shortlist is longer than it used to be.

The Guardian

The very richness of the subject combined, no doubt, with the restriction of limited space has, however, led to some conspicuous omissions.

The Economist

Yet Northup's own music – as distinct from a hammy score – is one of the film's conspicuous omissions: we never see the man making music for himself, an act that helped sustain him through a nightmare-ish ordeal.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, consider following "conspicuous omission" with a brief explanation of the potential consequences or implications of the omission.

Common error

Avoid using "conspicuous omission" for minor or unimportant exclusions. Doing so can weaken your credibility and make your writing seem hyperbolic. Reserve it for truly significant absences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conspicuous omission" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a specific absence or exclusion that is easily noticeable and often considered significant. Ludwig AI validates this usage through numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

13%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "conspicuous omission" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a noticeable absence, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions as a noun phrase, typically used to highlight a significant exclusion in various contexts, primarily in News & Media and Science. The phrase carries a neutral to formal register and is often employed to express criticism or raise concerns about the implications of the omission. When using the phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the context clearly indicates what is missing and why its absence is significant, avoiding exaggeration for minor exclusions. Alternatives such as "noticeable absence" or "glaring oversight" can be used depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious exclusion

Emphasizes the clear and evident nature of the exclusion.

noticeable absence

Highlights the readily apparent lack of something.

glaring oversight

Stresses the significant and easily visible nature of the mistake.

remarkable exclusion

Focuses on how noteworthy the exclusion is.

evident exclusion

Indicates that the exclusion is plain and easily seen.

palpable absence

Emphasizes the easily felt absence.

striking absence

Highlights the absence as being impressive or drawing attention.

noteworthy deletion

Indicates that the act of deleting something is significant.

significant exclusion

Highlights the importance of what was excluded.

plain disregard

Emphasizes the simple and obvious act of ignoring something.

FAQs

How can I use "conspicuous omission" in a sentence?

The phrase "conspicuous omission" typically points out a notable absence. For example, "The "conspicuous omission" of funding for renewable energy in the budget raises concerns about the government's commitment to sustainability".

What is a phrase similar to "conspicuous omission"?

Alternatives to "conspicuous omission" include "noticeable absence", "obvious exclusion", or "glaring oversight". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

What does "conspicuous omission" imply?

A "conspicuous omission" suggests that something important has been intentionally or unintentionally left out, and that this absence is readily apparent and potentially significant. It often implies criticism or suspicion.

Is there a difference between "conspicuous omission" and "intentional omission"?

While both refer to something being left out, "intentional omission" specifically implies that the act was deliberate. "Conspicuous omission" only indicates that the absence is noticeable, without necessarily implying intent.