consistent with prior research

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consistent with prior research" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing findings or conclusions that align with previously conducted studies or literature in a particular field. Example: "The results of this study are consistent with prior research, indicating that the treatment is effective in reducing symptoms."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their findings are consistent with prior research, although the magnitude of the effect is a bit smaller.

The New York Times

However, all results were consistent with prior research.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Nevertheless, these findings remain consistent with prior research.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Consistent with prior research, our research documented the association between evolution acceptance and religiosity.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

This finding is consistent with prior research (Bastos et al. 2010).

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

Consistent with prior research [e.g., Tung, R. L. (1998). American expatriates abroad: From neophytes to cosmopolitans.

Journal of World Business

Consistent with prior research, we show that users view incentive-inconsistent classifications as more credible than incentive-consistent classifications.

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Furthermore, consistent with prior research mind-wandering and distraction were correlated (r =.36; Unsworth, Brewer, et al., 2012).

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Analyses revealed two factors, pleasure and arousal, which are consistent with prior research (Mehrabian and Russell 1974).

Fashion and Textiles

Results were consistent with prior research on the LMT, with the standard cutoff score yielding high indices of accuracy.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Consistent with prior research, heartbeat monitoring engaged a circumscribed area spanning insular cortex and adjacent inferior frontal operculum.

NeuroImage

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "consistent with prior research", always cite the specific prior research to provide context and credibility to your claims.

Common error

Avoid stating that your findings are "consistent with prior research" without providing specific citations. Always include references to support your claim and allow readers to verify the consistency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with prior research" typically functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun (e.g., "results", "findings"). It's used to describe something that aligns or agrees with existing studies or investigations. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is widely used and grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

84%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consistent with prior research" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, its purpose is to assert that current findings align with previously established research, enhancing the credibility and validity of new information. To ensure accurate and effective communication, it's crucial to cite specific sources when using this phrase. Alternative expressions include "in agreement with previous studies" and "aligned with earlier findings". By adhering to best practices and avoiding common errors, writers can effectively use this phrase to convey the relationship between their work and existing knowledge.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in agreement with previous studies

Replaces "consistent with" with "in agreement with", emphasizing the alignment of findings.

aligned with earlier findings

Uses "aligned with" instead of "consistent with", highlighting the correspondence with prior results.

in line with previous research

Substitutes "consistent with" with "in line with", suggesting a similar direction or trend with existing studies.

corroborates existing literature

Employs "corroborates" to indicate support and confirmation of existing research.

supports prior investigations

Replaces "consistent with" with "supports", focusing on the reinforcement of previous research.

bears out previous studies

Uses "bears out" to suggest that the current findings confirm the validity of prior studies.

is congruent with past research

Employs "congruent" to highlight the harmonious agreement with previous research.

reaffirms earlier conclusions

Uses "reaffirms" to indicate that the new findings strengthen existing conclusions.

echoes previous results

Uses "echoes" to illustrate a resemblance between current and past results.

parallels existing scholarly work

Employs "parallels" to show a similarity or correspondence with existing academic work.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with prior research" in a sentence?

You can use "consistent with prior research" to show that your findings align with previous studies. For example: "Our results are "consistent with prior research", suggesting that the intervention is effective."

What's a simpler way to say "consistent with prior research"?

Alternatives include "in agreement with previous studies", "aligned with earlier findings", or "in line with previous research".

Is it always necessary to cite sources when using "consistent with prior research"?

Yes, it's crucial to cite the specific prior research you're referring to. This provides credibility to your claims and allows readers to verify the consistency. Failing to do so can weaken your argument.

How does "consistent with prior research" differ from "contradicts prior research"?

"Consistent with prior research" indicates that your findings support or align with previous studies, while "contradicts prior research" suggests that your results are in opposition to earlier findings. It's essential to accurately represent the relationship between your work and existing literature.