consistent with previous results

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consistent with previous results" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to draw a comparison between two sets of data, such as in this example: "The results of the most recent study were consistent with previous results, indicating a consistent trend."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These results are consistent with previous results obtained in an arthritis pain model14.

Nature

These data are consistent with previous results on the entrance of neutrophils into the endothelial cell layer30.

Nature

These data are consistent with previous results showing that SR45 binds to the plant spliceosome subunits U1-70K and U2AF35.

Nature

The array findings were consistent with previous results as genes such as CCL2, ADAM12, MMP2, and CCL7 were upregulated.

Nature

Consistent with previous results, we find that the Ft/Ds/Fj-module has an effect on a MT-cytoskeleton.

Stanford University

The outputs of the equations are consistent with previous results, where available.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The results we find are fully consistent with previous results for data interpolation.

Journal of Computational Physics

The obtained currents are consistent with previous results.

Earth, Planets and Space

Consistent with previous results, both groups showed normal potentiated startle response, and no group differences in EMG were found.

Duke University

These findings are surprisingly consistent with previous results from research using daily paper diaries in the pre-biologics era.

Duke University

This is consistent with previous results from the word count application.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "consistent with previous results", clearly cite the specific prior studies or data that you are referencing to provide context and support for your statement.

Common error

Avoid stating that results are "consistent with previous results" without specifying which results or studies. Vague statements lack credibility. Always provide specific references.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with previous results" functions as an adjectival phrase, typically used to modify a statement or finding. It indicates that the current observation aligns with or supports earlier research. As Ludwig AI confirms, its use is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

71%

Academia

17%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "consistent with previous results" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific and academic contexts, to indicate agreement between current findings and earlier research. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical validity. When using this phrase, it's crucial to cite the specific prior studies or data being referenced to enhance credibility. Alternatives like "in agreement with prior findings" can be used for variety. Avoiding vague statements and always providing specific references is a best practice. The phrase's high frequency and authoritative source usage underscore its importance in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in agreement with prior findings

This alternative replaces "consistent" with "in agreement", emphasizing the alignment with previous research.

in line with earlier outcomes

Using "in line with" suggests a parallel or alignment, replacing "consistent" and "results" with "outcomes".

concordant with past outcomes

"Concordant" is a more formal synonym for "consistent", implying harmony or agreement with previous results.

aligns with prior research

This phrase replaces the original structure with a more concise and active construction, focusing on alignment.

supports previous conclusions

This alternative focuses on the support provided to earlier conclusions rather than direct consistency.

confirms earlier data

Using "confirms" emphasizes the validation aspect, suggesting that the data reinforces previous findings.

corroborates previous data

"Corroborates" suggests strengthening or confirming previous findings with new evidence.

is validated by prior results

This phrase highlights the validation aspect, indicating that the current findings are supported by previous results.

echoes previous observations

"Echoes" suggests a similarity or recurrence of previous observations in the current findings.

parallels previous research

This alternative focuses on the parallel between the current findings and previous research, suggesting similarities.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with previous results" in a sentence?

You can use "consistent with previous results" to show agreement between current and past findings, such as: "The observed increase in reaction time was "consistent with previous results", suggesting a similar cognitive process is involved."

What is a more formal way to say "consistent with previous results"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "in agreement with prior findings", or "concordant with past outcomes".

Is it always necessary to cite the "previous results" when using this phrase?

Yes, it's best practice to cite the specific studies or data you are referring to. This provides context and strengthens your argument. For instance, "The observed trend is "consistent with previous results" [Smith et al., 2020; Jones, 2022]."

What's the difference between "consistent with previous results" and "similar to previous results"?

"Consistent with previous results" implies a direct alignment or agreement in the findings, whereas "similar to previous results" suggests a resemblance but not necessarily a perfect match. Consistency indicates stronger support.