Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
consistent with previous research
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
It is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to support an argument with findings from prior research that is in agreement with your current work. For example, "This new study suggests that certain environmental factors can influence child development. This finding is consistent with previous research which showed that exposure to certain environmental toxins can cause developmental delays."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(14)
aligned with earlier findings
in line with prior investigations
consistent with earlier research
in agreement with prior findings
in agreement with previous studies
in line with previous studies
supports previous findings
in line with previous researches
consistent with previous studies
in line with previous research
agreement with past studies
aligns with earlier findings
corroborates existing literature
agreement with previous results
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
That finding is consistent with previous research.
News & Media
Consistent with previous research for England (Bowling and Windsor, 2008.
Science
But its findings were consistent with previous research.
News & Media
Consistent with previous research, the association between HPE and maternal history of diabetes merits further investigation.
Academia
Consistent with previous research, this paper finds that there is international diffusion of technology.
Science
Consistent with previous research, there were significant correlations between third ventricle width and neuropsychological tests.
Science
Consistent with previous research, the results also indicate significant noise in pre-open prices.
Science
Consistent with previous research, all participants were sensitive to incentive manipulations.
These findings are consistent with previous research that protein is more satiating than carbohydrate.
Science
Results are consistent with previous research conducted in a different country, using a different language.
Conclusions: Return to work rates after SCI were consistent with previous research.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "consistent with previous research", always cite the specific studies or findings that support your statement to provide credibility and allow readers to verify the alignment. Be as specific as possible to strengthen your argument.
Common error
Avoid simply stating that your findings are "consistent with previous research" without providing specific citations or details about the prior work. This weakens your argument and doesn't allow readers to evaluate the validity of the comparison. Always provide context and cite relevant sources.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "consistent with previous research" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a statement or finding by indicating that it aligns with existing scholarly work. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to strengthen the credibility and context of a claim by relating it to established knowledge.
Frequent in
Science
73%
News & Media
18%
Academia
9%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "consistent with previous research" is a common and grammatically sound way to show alignment between new findings and existing knowledge. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is frequently used in scientific, academic, and news contexts to support claims and enhance credibility. When using this phrase, remember to cite specific studies to provide context and allow readers to verify your statements. Alternatives such as "in agreement with prior studies" or "supported by existing literature" can be used to add variety to your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
in agreement with prior studies
Replaces "consistent" with "in agreement" and "research" with "studies", emphasizing the alignment of findings.
aligned with earlier findings
Uses "aligned" instead of "consistent", suggesting a direct correspondence with previous results.
in line with prior investigations
Employs "in line with" as a substitute for "consistent with", indicating a parallel direction with earlier work.
supported by existing literature
Focuses on the backing provided by the current body of knowledge, replacing "research" with "literature".
corroborated by past research
Highlights the confirmation aspect, using "corroborated" to emphasize the reinforcing nature of the present findings.
validated by previous studies
Emphasizes that past studies confirm your results.
echoed in prior research
Uses "echoed" to illustrate that the current research reflects previous research.
mirrored in past investigations
Uses "mirrored" to show that the current research resembles past investigations.
in accordance with prior analyses
Replaces "consistent" with "in accordance", highlighting agreement in previous analysis.
bears out previous research
Indicates that current findings support and confirm previous research.
FAQs
How do I use "consistent with previous research" in a sentence?
You can use "consistent with previous research" to show that your findings align with earlier studies. For example, "The observed increase in student engagement is "consistent with previous research" on the effectiveness of interactive learning methods."
What are some alternatives to "consistent with previous research"?
Alternatives include "in agreement with prior studies", "aligned with earlier findings", or "supported by existing literature", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "consistent with previous research" or "validated by previous research"?
While both are valid, ""consistent with previous research"" generally implies agreement or alignment, while "validated by previous research" suggests stronger confirmation or verification of the current findings by prior studies.
What does it mean when research findings are "consistent with previous research"?
It means that the results of a current study support or align with the findings of earlier studies on the same or a related topic, increasing confidence in the validity and reliability of the overall body of knowledge.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested