Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered include
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered include" is not correct and usable in written English.
You can use the phrase "included" or "take into consideration" instead. Example: We took into consideration various factors during our analysis.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Other names he considered include Fail2yield Atalltimes and X. Sesivspeed.
News & Media
Sites that have been considered include Memphis and Los Angeles.
News & Media
Options being considered include regulation or an industry code of practice.
News & Media
Factors now being considered include water use, dye impact, soil health, labor issues and fair trade.
News & Media
Ideas that are being seriously considered include a cash injection into the industry while a buyer is found.
News & Media
Options being considered include a 1.3-mile tunnel or diverting the road to the north or south of the site.
News & Media
The factors considered include broadband and mobile-phone penetration, as well as government regulation.
News & Media
Features that must be considered include.
Science
Other drive mechanisms considered include fracture closure and water expansion.
Gases considered include H2, CH4, N2, CO2, CO and SH2.
Science
Materials considered include titanium, aluminium and carbon fibre composite.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "considered include" in formal writing. Instead, use "included" or "were considered" to ensure grammatical accuracy.
Common error
A common mistake is using the base form of the verb "include" after "considered". Ensure you use the past participle or a different grammatical structure to maintain correctness. For example use "included" or "that were considered" instead of "considered include".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered include" is grammatically incorrect; it attempts to function as a verb phrase where "considered" modifies an intended list, but it fails due to improper verb conjugation. Ludwig AI suggests using "included" or "take into consideration" instead.
Frequent in
Science
47%
News & Media
39%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
While the phrase "considered include" appears frequently across various sources, it's crucial to recognize its grammatical incorrectness. Ludwig AI highlights that better alternatives exist, such as "included" or "were considered". Though prevalent in both scientific and news contexts, its use should be avoided in formal writing. To maintain clarity and precision, especially in academic or professional settings, opting for grammatically sound alternatives is always the best practice. Remember to ensure your writing is clear, correct, and credible by using proper grammatical structures.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
included
This is the simplest and most direct replacement, correcting the grammatical error by using the past participle form as a verb.
taken into account
This phrase emphasizes that something was actively considered as part of a decision or assessment.
factors considered
This option focuses specifically on the items that were part of a larger evaluation or analysis.
elements considered
Similar to 'factors considered', this highlights components that were evaluated.
aspects considered
This emphasizes the different facets or angles that were part of a comprehensive review.
points considered
This suggests that specific, notable items were given attention and thought.
options considered
This is used when referring to different possible choices or alternatives that were evaluated.
alternatives considered
Similar to 'options considered', but more explicitly refers to different potential paths or solutions.
features considered
This is used to highlight the characteristics or attributes that were taken into account.
criteria considered
This emphasizes the standards or benchmarks used for evaluation.
FAQs
How can I correctly use "considered include" in a sentence?
The phrase "considered include" is grammatically incorrect. To correct it, you can use alternatives like "included" or "were considered". For example, instead of saying "Factors considered include cost and time", say "Factors included cost and time" or "Factors that were considered include cost and time".
What's a simple replacement for "considered include"?
A simple and grammatically correct replacement for "considered include" is "included". It directly and effectively conveys the meaning of being part of something taken into account.
Is it ever appropriate to use "considered include" in writing?
No, it is generally not appropriate to use "considered include" in formal or academic writing due to its grammatical incorrectness. Opt for "included" or a similar alternative.
What are some alternatives to "considered include" that maintain a formal tone?
For a formal tone, consider using phrases like "taken into account", "were considered", or "aspects considered". These alternatives provide grammatical correctness while maintaining a professional style.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested