considered identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "considered identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something or someone is recognized or acknowledged as being identified, often in formal or legal discussions. Example: "The suspect was considered identified after the witness provided a clear description."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Sequenced DNA was compared using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP and GenBank-National Center for Biotechnology InformationNCBICBI) database, and sequence similarities above 99% were considered identified for species the level and above 98% for the genus level.

AMB Express

Proteins were considered identified when at least two peptides were matched with >99.5% MS/MS confidence.

Plosone

The protein was considered identified when at least two peptide sequence matches above identity threshold were present.

Plosone

Proteins were considered identified if at least two unique peptide sequences with IonsScores over 26 were detected.

Plosone

All identified peptides were first recalibrated using MSQuant [23] and then only proteins with at least two unique peptide sequences, IonsScores greater than 30 and an absolute calibrated mass error of <5 ppm were considered identified.

Plosone

We considered identified proteins with greater than 10% peptide coverage to be a synaptic candidate ubiquitinated protein (synCUP) if they also had a Tg/non-Tg spec ratio greater than 2. A total of 279 proteins met these criteria (Table S2 and S3).

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

Several years ago, he had briefly considered identifying the perpetrators, but he says that when he told Adams of his intentions Adams replied, "I hope you are ready for the backlash".

The New Yorker

We considered identifying the general population sample using the electoral register.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The possibility of introducing single new links is considered, identifying the potential savings in travel time.

Health Care Management Science

This suggests that teachers considered identifying students at HR for psychosis a worthwhile behaviour and would attempt identification during the school day.

BMC Health Services Research

The government and its partners should take keen note of this and consider identifying, strengthening, and supporting community-led structures, especially in counties not yet affected by the virus.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "considered identified" in scientific writing, ensure you clearly state the criteria or thresholds used to make the identification. This adds rigor and transparency to your methodology.

Common error

Avoid using "considered identified" without specifying the parameters or standards used for identification. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the validity of your findings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "considered identified" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has been recognized or determined to be of a certain identity based on specific criteria or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

87%

News & Media

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "considered identified" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase, primarily in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is best used when specific criteria or thresholds are applied to determine an identification. Remember to clearly state those criteria to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "deemed identified" or "regarded as identified" can be used for similar effect. By understanding its proper usage, writers can enhance the clarity and precision of their work.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deemed identified

Emphasizes a formal judgment or decision.

regarded as identified

Highlights a particular viewpoint or assessment.

recognized as identified

Focuses on the act of acknowledging something already known.

classified as identified

Suggests a systematic categorization process.

determined to be identified

Implies a process of investigation and conclusion.

ascertained to be identified

Conveys a sense of discovering or confirming something with certainty.

established as identified

Indicates that something has been firmly proven or accepted.

validated as identified

Highlights that something has been checked and confirmed.

confirmed as identified

Focuses on the act of verifying an identification.

found to be identified

Implies a discovery through a specific search or process.

FAQs

How can I use "considered identified" in a research paper?

In research, use "considered identified" to describe how you determined the identity of a substance, organism, or concept based on specific criteria. For example, "Proteins were "considered identified" when at least two unique peptides matched with high confidence."

What's a good alternative to "considered identified" in formal writing?

In formal writing, you could use alternatives such as "deemed identified" or "regarded as identified" to maintain a professional tone. These phrases provide similar meaning while emphasizing the formality of the determination.

Is it appropriate to use "considered identified" in news articles?

Yes, it is appropriate in news articles, especially when reporting on scientific or technical topics where precise identification is important. However, ensure the context is clear to the average reader.

How does "considered identified" differ from simply saying "identified"?

"Considered identified" implies that the identification process involved specific criteria or a degree of judgment, whereas "identified" is a more general statement of having determined what something is. If you say something was just "identified", it does not suggest the identity was questionable or required a special rule for its recognition.