Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
considered consisted of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "considered consisted of" is not correct in English and does not make sense as it combines two verbs improperly.
You cannot use it in written English as it lacks grammatical coherence and clarity. Example: "The committee considered consisted of various experts" is incorrect.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
participated consisted of
were composed of
was consisted of
were consisted of
comprised of
recommendations consisted of
members consisted of
were comprised of
began consisted of
was characterized by
were made up of
contained
well consisted of
was made up of
was composed of
comprised
were a part of
included
described consisted of
were included in
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
6 human-written examples
The windows considered consisted of a double pane glazing unit in which a controllable absorbing layer is added on the interior surface of the exterior glass pane.
Science
The pattern considered consisted of a series of parallel tracks oriented perpendicularly to the flow and submitted to copper deposition from a sulphuric bath.
Science
The sample size used was 50 individuals, the genome considered consisted of 2200 independent loci on 22 chromosomes; each scenario was replicated 100 times.
The citable research considered consisted of journal articles, book chapters, and working papers and reports typically produced by research institutes, universities, and other independent research units.
The next data set we considered consisted of 295 short (532 nt) sequences obtained from 31 patients involved in the analysis of a Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) outbreak.
Science
The population considered consisted of people diagnosed with type 1 or 2; the contexts of interest were hospitals, clinics, and home settings in India, outcomes comprised direct and indirect costs for health systems, households and individuals; and, the relevant study designs were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and observational studies and surveys.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
The pipe considered consists of identical substructures, or cells, connected in an identical fashion.
The FRP material systems considered consist of carbon, aramid, or glass fibers in epoxy or matrices.
A generic system is considered consisting of solar photovoltaics, wind turbine, microturbine, battery array, and electric boiler.
The system considered consists of a rectangular plate coated on one face with a perfectly adherent thin film.
Nine combinations of boundary conditions are considered, consisting of simply supported, clamped and free edges on different plate edges.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "considered consisted of" in your writing. It's grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "considered to consist of" or other alternatives such as "comprised", "included", or "contained" for clarity and accuracy.
Common error
The common mistake is combining "considered" (past tense) with "consisted" (also past tense) when "consist" should be in the infinitive form after "considered to". Always use "considered to consist of".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "considered consisted of" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as non-standard English. A correct phrasing would be "considered to consist of".
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "considered consisted of" is identified by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "considered to consist of". While the intent is to describe the components or elements that make up something, the grammatical error undermines its effectiveness. When aiming for accuracy and clarity, particularly in academic or formal settings, it is crucial to use the correct form. Alternatives such as "comprised of", "included", or "contained" can also be used to express a similar meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
considered to consist of
Replaces the past tense "consisted" with the infinitive "to consist", resulting in a grammatically correct structure with similar meaning.
was considered to be composed of
Uses "was considered" and "to be composed of" to provide a more formal and grammatically sound alternative.
was deemed to include
Substitutes "consisted of" with "was deemed to include" to offer a different phrasing with similar intent, emphasizing inclusion.
was regarded as comprising
Employs "was regarded as comprising" to give a sophisticated alternative, emphasizing the elements that make up the whole.
was viewed as containing
Replaces "consisted of" with "was viewed as containing", focusing on the components or elements that something holds.
was understood to encompass
Uses "was understood to encompass" to suggest a broader inclusion, implying the elements are within a larger scope.
was known to embody
Employs "was known to embody" to indicate the representation or exemplification of certain qualities or elements.
was interpreted as featuring
Replaces "consisted of" with "was interpreted as featuring", highlighting specific attributes or characteristics.
was characterized by
Substitutes "consisted of" with "was characterized by", emphasizing the defining traits or features.
was defined as having
Uses "was defined as having" to provide a clear, definitional aspect, emphasizing what something possesses.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "considered" when describing the parts of something?
The correct way is to use "considered to consist of" rather than "considered consisted of". For example, "The committee was considered to consist of experts" is correct.
What can I say instead of "considered consisted of"?
You can use alternatives like "comprised of", "included", or "contained" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "considered consisted of" or "considered to consist of"?
"Considered consisted of" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "considered to consist of".
What's the difference between "considered to consist of" and "was made up of"?
"Considered to consist of" is a more formal way of saying "was made up of". Both phrases describe the components of something, but "considered to consist of" is often used in academic or professional contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested