considerably less comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "considerably less comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to compare the extent or detail of two different subjects, indicating that one is significantly lacking in comprehensiveness compared to the other. Example: "The new report is considerably less comprehensive than the previous one, missing several key analyses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

To be sure, the musical is considerably less comprehensive than Mr. Caro's 1,286-page 1,286-page 1974 Power booker," which follows Moses' career as ciThePower commissioner and chairman of the TriBrokerh Bridge and Tunnel Authority.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

It's considerably cheaper, but it's also less comprehensive.

Forbes

In the meantime, please feel free to read David Lengel's position-by-position comparison between the Cardinals and Red Sox's rosters, Harry J. Enten's comprehensive look at the histories of both the St Louis and Boston ballclubs, and my considerably less thorough guide to the two teams and much much more.

The Guardian - Sport

Although the reproductive health context in Thailand is considerably less bleak than in Burma [ 9], women from Burma residing in Thailand also face significant barriers to accessing comprehensive services.

Conflict and Health

Pennsylvania is considerably less elastic.

The New York Times

Almost all make considerably less.

The New York Times - Sports

But most earn considerably less.

The New York Times - Food

Snacking would be considerably less.

The New York Times

Winter rates are considerably less.

The New York Times - Travel

Smulian was considerably less composed.

The New Yorker

Entrees were considerably less pleasant.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "considerably less comprehensive", ensure the contrast between the two subjects being compared is genuinely significant. Avoid using it for minor differences in scope.

Common error

Avoid using "considerably less comprehensive" when the difference is marginal. Overstating the difference can weaken your argument and make it seem exaggerated.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "considerably less comprehensive" functions as a comparative modifier, indicating that one thing is significantly lacking in comprehensiveness when compared to another. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "considerably less comprehensive" is a grammatically correct phrase used to express that something is significantly less thorough or complete than something else. While Ludwig AI validates its correctness, its usage is relatively rare. The phrase is most commonly found in news and scientific contexts. When using this phrase, ensure the difference you are highlighting is genuinely significant to avoid exaggeration. Alternatives include "significantly less detailed" or "substantially less thorough".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significantly less detailed

Replaces "comprehensive" with "detailed", focusing on the level of detail rather than overall scope. "Significantly" maintains a strong degree of difference.

substantially less thorough

Substitutes "comprehensive" with "thorough", highlighting the depth of investigation. "Substantially" still indicates a major difference.

markedly less exhaustive

Uses "exhaustive" to emphasize the completeness of the original and "markedly" to indicate a noticeable difference.

noticeably less encompassing

Emphasizes the breadth of coverage with "encompassing" and uses "noticeably" to suggest an easily observed difference.

appreciably less inclusive

Focuses on what is included, using "inclusive", and quantifies the difference with "appreciably".

considerably more superficial

Shifts to a more negative connotation by describing the alternative as "superficial", implying a lack of depth.

much less in-depth

Uses a simpler structure to express the same idea, focusing on the depth of analysis.

considerably narrower in scope

Specifies that the difference lies in the "scope" or breadth of the subject matter.

somewhat less complete

Reduces the degree of difference, suggesting a smaller gap in completeness with "somewhat".

materially less extensive

Replaces "comprehensive" with "extensive" and uses "materially" to indicate a tangible difference.

FAQs

What does "considerably less comprehensive" mean?

It means something is significantly less thorough or complete than something else. The term indicates a noticeable difference in the extent or scope of coverage.

How can I use "considerably less comprehensive" in a sentence?

You might say, "This report is "considerably less comprehensive" than the previous one because it omits several key data points."

What are some alternatives to "considerably less comprehensive"?

Alternatives include "significantly less detailed", "substantially less thorough", or "markedly less exhaustive". The best choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "considerably less comprehensive"?

Use it when there's a clear and important difference in the scope or depth between two things. For instance, if one document provides a full overview while another offers only a brief summary, "considerably less comprehensive" is appropriate.