consequence argument

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consequence argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions related to philosophy, ethics, or logic, particularly when referring to arguments that focus on the consequences of actions or beliefs. Example: "The consequence argument suggests that the outcomes of our actions are crucial in determining their moral value."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

And the Consequence Argument provides powerful support for this argument's second premise.

SEP

For an excellent assessment of these compatibilist replies to the consequence argument, see Fischer 1994.

SEP

It is fair to say that the Consequence Argument earned the incompatibilists the dialectical advantage.

SEP

Let us first consider three different compatibilist attempts to unseat the Consequence Argument.

SEP

This argument, first developed by Carl Ginet, came to be known as the Consequence Argument (Ginet, 1966).

SEP

This premise, supported as it is by the Consequence Argument and near cousins of the Consequence Argument (see section 4.1), will demand of Wolf that, minimally, she show what is wrong with arguments like the Consequence Argument, and optimally, that she offer some positive compatibilist account of the ability to do otherwise.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

As a consequence, arguments about the chronology of the first use of florfenicol may have limited relevance.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The European Court, however, held that the issue touched upon family life and that sexual orientation fell within the protective scope of Article 8. Ms Gas and Dubois's argued that the 'unintended legal consequences' argument affected only same-sex couples since, unlike heterosexual couples, they could not get married and rely on the exception in article 365 of the Civil Code.

The Guardian

With Lebanon and Iraq already simmering, the "balance of consequences" argument against any sort of direct military intervention is still a powerful one.

Huffington Post

Now Adams extends this consequence to arguments involving conditionals.

SEP

In this new situation the equalities and inequalities hold almost everywhere and, in consequence, the arguments must be directed to positive measurable sets.

Boundary Value Problems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the "consequence argument", ensure the causal link between the action and its consequences is well-established and clearly articulated to strengthen the argument's validity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two events are correlated, one directly causes the other. The "consequence argument" requires a clear, demonstrable causal relationship, not just a correlation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consequence argument" functions as a noun phrase that identifies a specific philosophical argument. This argument is primarily used in discussions about free will and determinism. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "consequence argument" is a recognized term in philosophy, specifically addressing the debate between free will and determinism. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for use in formal writing. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, this term identifies a specific line of reasoning with significant implications for understanding moral responsibility. The "consequence argument"'s consistent usage in scholarly discussions makes it a key concept for anyone exploring these intricate philosophical questions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Argument from consequences

This alternative emphasizes the reasoning process that starts with the consequences of an action or belief.

Argument from effect

This alternative highlights how the argument stems from observing an effect and reasoning backward to its cause.

Argument based on outcomes

This phrase directly focuses on the results or effects as the basis for the argument.

Outcome-driven argument

Similar to 'argument based on outcomes', but emphasizes the driving force being the desired outcome.

Results-oriented argument

This emphasizes the focus of the argument on achieving specific results or consequences.

Argument by implication

This phrase emphasizes the implied results and their impact on the validity of a claim.

Teleological argument

This term relates more broadly to arguments based on the end purpose or goal, often implying a focus on outcomes.

Forward-looking argument

This emphasizes the prospective nature of the argument, focusing on future outcomes and their potential impact.

Consequentialist reasoning

This highlights the broader philosophical approach where actions are justified by their consequences.

Pragmatic argument

This term focuses on the practical consequences and real-world implications of a belief or action.

FAQs

What is the main idea behind the "consequence argument"?

The "consequence argument" primarily concerns the relationship between determinism and free will, suggesting that if determinism is true, our actions are merely consequences of past events and natural laws, thus undermining free will.

How does the "consequence argument" relate to compatibilism and incompatibilism?

The "consequence argument" is a central point of contention between compatibilists and incompatibilists. Compatibilists attempt to reconcile free will with determinism, often challenging the premises of the argument, while incompatibilists use it to argue that free will and determinism are fundamentally incompatible.

What are some philosophical alternatives to the "consequence argument"?

Some philosophical alternatives include "Frankfurt counterexamples", which challenge the principle of alternative possibilities, and various compatibilist accounts of free will that redefine the concept of freedom in deterministic terms.

How can I effectively use the "consequence argument" in philosophical discussions?

To effectively use the "consequence argument", clearly define its premises, such as the fixity of the past and the laws of nature, and address potential objections. Be prepared to discuss alternative viewpoints, like "compatibilist responses" and "libertarianism".