conflicting conclusions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conflicting conclusions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing different outcomes or interpretations that do not agree with each other, often in the context of research or analysis. Example: "The study presented conflicting conclusions, making it difficult to determine the most accurate result."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

With different goals came different approaches, and sometimes conflicting conclusions.

The New York Times

Researchers have reached conflicting conclusions on what technology is best.

The New York Times

Various investigations into the event came up with conflicting conclusions as if to suit every ideology and associated theories.

The New York Times

Indeed several recent, authoritative scientific assessments have reached conflicting conclusions.

Science Magazine

Different but equally plausible lines of though lead us to conflicting conclusions.

SEP

Conflicting conclusions could be due to a difference in disease burden between studies.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Electrophysiological and morphological analyses of vagal mechanoreceptors in the gut wall suggest conflicting conclusions.

Brain Research Reviews

The use of xylitol on orthodontic patients has been studied by several researchers with somewhat conflicting conclusions [22 24].

Progress in Orthodontics

There are conflicting conclusions in the literature about whether GBHs might impact adversely upon mineral nutrition in GR crops.

Environmental Sciences Europe

The investigations produced conflicting conclusions.

Wikipedia

Studies evaluating the effect of circumcision on the incidence of other sexually transmitted infections have reached conflicting conclusions.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "conflicting conclusions", clearly identify the sources or studies that are in disagreement to provide context and allow readers to evaluate the evidence.

Common error

Avoid using "conflicting conclusions" without specifying the area of conflict. Be precise about what aspects are contradictory to avoid misleading readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conflicting conclusions" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object or subject complement in a sentence. It describes a situation where different studies, reports, or investigations have arrived at contradictory or opposing outcomes. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

32%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conflicting conclusions" is a frequently used and grammatically sound phrase that describes situations where different sources present opposing results. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and news media contexts, the phrase serves to highlight disagreement and the need for further investigation. When employing this phrase, ensure you specify the sources of the conflict to provide context and clarity. Alternatives such as "contradictory findings" or "inconsistent results" may be used depending on the specific nuance desired.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contradictory findings

Highlights the opposition between research outcomes.

inconsistent results

Emphasizes the lack of uniformity in the outcomes observed.

divergent outcomes

Focuses on the different paths the results take.

opposing viewpoints

Stresses the contrast between different perspectives or analyses.

discrepant results

Indicates a lack of agreement or correspondence among the findings.

varying interpretations

Highlights differences in how the data is understood.

mixed results

Suggests a combination of positive and negative, or agreeing and disagreeing, outcomes.

discordant findings

Emphasizes the lack of harmony or agreement among the research results.

unsettled debates

Suggests that the final answer is not yet known, implying "conflicting conclusions".

ambiguous findings

Highlights that the findings are not certain because they point to "conflicting conclusions".

FAQs

How can I use "conflicting conclusions" in a sentence?

You can use "conflicting conclusions" to describe situations where different studies or analyses arrive at opposing results. For example: "The research on this topic has produced "conflicting conclusions", making it difficult to draw firm conclusions."

What are some alternatives to "conflicting conclusions"?

Alternatives include "contradictory findings", "inconsistent results", or "divergent outcomes". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "conflicting conclusions" or "conflicting conclusion"?

"Conflicting conclusions" is generally used when referring to multiple studies or sources that disagree. "Conflicting conclusion" might be appropriate if referring to a single study that presents contradictory findings within itself.

What's the difference between "conflicting conclusions" and "mixed results"?

"Conflicting conclusions" implies a direct opposition between different analyses, while "mixed results" suggests a combination of both positive and negative or agreeing and disagreeing outcomes within a single study or analysis.