conflict with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conflict with" is a grammatically correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that two or more ideas, opinions, or situations are incompatible or contradict each other. For example: "The new policy conflicts with our existing rules and regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That would create further conflict with Israel.

The New York Times

Wisler had a conflict with the party.

The New Yorker

First, they often conflict with one another.

The New York Times

Bottom: Protesters in conflict with police.

The New Yorker

Tells about his conflict with Masson.

The New Yorker

Do you have conflict with family members?

The New York Times

not conflict with the above.

Harvard University

conflict with five other circuits.

Harvard University

Religion does not conflict with medicine".

The Guardian

And possible conflict with the police.

The New Yorker

There's no conflict with [NHS nurse colleagues].

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "conflict with", ensure that the subjects of the conflict are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what is conflicting with what.

Common error

Avoid vague sentences where the conflict is undefined. For instance, instead of saying "There is a conflict with the project", specify "The project's deadline conflicts with the availability of key personnel".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conflict with" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating incompatibility or contradiction between two or more entities or ideas. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

20%

Science

19%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "conflict with" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to denote incompatibility or contradiction. As Ludwig underlines, its widespread presence across news, academic, and scientific domains attests to its importance in both formal and informal discourse. When employing "conflict with", clarity is key: ensure that the subjects in conflict are explicitly stated to prevent ambiguity. Remember alternatives like "clash with" or "contradict" may better suit specific contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clash with

Similar to "conflict with", but often implies a more direct and immediate confrontation.

contradict

Indicates a direct opposition or inconsistency between two statements or ideas.

be at odds with

Suggests a state of disagreement or opposition, often ongoing or inherent.

be incompatible with

Emphasizes the inability of two things to coexist or work together harmoniously.

run counter to

Implies opposition or resistance to something, often a plan or expectation.

be in opposition to

Formally states disagreement or resistance to a particular idea or entity.

be inconsistent with

Highlights a lack of uniformity or agreement between different elements.

be contrary to

Indicates a direct contrast or opposition to an established rule or expectation.

disagree with

A simple and direct way to express a difference of opinion.

be at variance with

Suggests a divergence or difference, often in details or specific aspects.

FAQs

How can I use "conflict with" in a sentence?

Use "conflict with" to indicate that two things are incompatible or contradictory. For example, "The new regulations "conflict with" existing policies".

What are some alternatives to "conflict with"?

You can use alternatives like "clash with", "contradict", or "be at odds with" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "conflict with" or "conflicts with"?

"Conflict with" is used when the subject is plural or "I/you/we/they", while "conflicts with" is used when the subject is singular or "he/she/it". For example, "The rules conflict with my beliefs" versus "The rule conflicts with my belief".

What's the difference between "conflict with" and "conflict between"?

"Conflict with" highlights the incompatibility between two things, while "conflict between" emphasizes a struggle or dispute between two parties. For example, "The schedule "conflict with" my plans" versus "There is a conflict between the two departments".