Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

conducted to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conducted to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct phrase would be "conducted to" when referring to leading someone or something to a particular place or outcome. Example: "The research was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the new treatment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

James Lowe conducted to good effect.

Autopsies will be conducted to determine the causes of death.

News & Media

The New York Times

Tells about research conducted to discover what their ailment was.

News & Media

The New Yorker

What studies were conducted to emphasize this relationship?

News & Media

The New York Times

The score was conducted to great acclaim by André Previn.

Time did not pass, but was conducted to the brain.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Experiments are conducted to validate the model.

1-week time analysis conducted to calculate staff time.

BET measurement is conducted to examine this hypothesis.

Short-term filtration tests were conducted to evaluate critical flux.

④ Searching contour is conducted to the binary image.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing research or experiments, replace "conducted to" with more precise language like "conducted in order to" or "conducted to determine." This clarifies the purpose of the study.

Common error

Avoid using "conducted to" when you mean "led to" or "guided to." "Conduct" implies carrying out a process, not directing something towards a destination or result. For instance, use "led to" instead of "conducted to" when describing how one event caused another.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conducted to" functions primarily as part of a verb phrase, often indicating the purpose or intent behind an action. However, Ludwig AI suggests it's frequently used incorrectly, highlighting a potential misunderstanding of its grammatical function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

26%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "conducted to" is frequently used, especially in scientific and news contexts, but often incorrectly. Ludwig AI points out that it's better to use "conducted in order to" or similar phrases to clearly express the intention behind an action. When you mean "led to," using that phrase provides greater accuracy. While commonly found, the phrase's usage needs careful attention to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity. Alternatives like "carried out in order to" or "performed with the aim of" can improve precision. Therefore, while "conducted to" appears often, mindful and precise language is crucial for effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use the word "conducted" correctly in a sentence?

Use "conducted" to describe the act of organizing and carrying out an activity, such as an experiment or investigation. For example, "The experiment was "conducted to" test a new hypothesis." Better alternatives are: "The experiment was "conducted in order to" test a new hypothesis."

What are some common mistakes people make when using "conducted to"?

A common mistake is using "conducted to" when you mean "led to" or "resulted in." "Conducted" refers to the process of carrying out something, while "led to" describes the outcome. For example, instead of "The research conducted to surprising results", say "The research "led to" surprising results".

What can I say instead of "the study was conducted to"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "the study was "performed to"", "the study was "carried out to"", or "the study was "undertaken to"".

Is it ever correct to say "conducted to"?

While not grammatically ideal in most contexts, "conducted to" is used incorrectly if your intention is to describe the reason for conducting something. It's usually better to use "conducted in order to" or similar phrases for clarity. If the aim is to mean "led to", use "led to".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: